Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3 bytes removed ,  14:53, October 11, 2017
Line 45: Line 45:  
[[Richard M. Weaver]] in ''Ideas Have Consequences,'' argued that Thomas Aquinas' imposition of Aristotle on the Roman Catholic Church caused the church to turn away from rigorous morality and to accept pragmatic acquiescence to the world.<ref>Richard M. Weaver, Ideas Have Consequences (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948), 119.</ref>
 
[[Richard M. Weaver]] in ''Ideas Have Consequences,'' argued that Thomas Aquinas' imposition of Aristotle on the Roman Catholic Church caused the church to turn away from rigorous morality and to accept pragmatic acquiescence to the world.<ref>Richard M. Weaver, Ideas Have Consequences (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948), 119.</ref>
   −
The Christian apologist and philosopher [[Francis Schaeffer]] offered a similar indictment on Thomas Aquinas in ''Escape from Reason''. Schaeffer argued that Aquinas "separated nature from grace," or, he allowed for the study of the earthly realm to be entirely removed from the study of Christianity. In doing so, he "laid the groundwork for the Humanistic Renaissance" and the "autonomous individual." Schaeffer reprimanded Aquinas for his belief in the intrinsic goodness of man—a radically unconservative persuasion. Aquinas believed that, though the will was affected by the fall, the intellect was not. Thus, reasoning and philosophy became free to be pursued without subjugation to the limitations of the Scriptures and divine revelation. Schaeffer viewed Aquinas as one of the founding fathers of liberal modernity, accrediting to him some responsibility for the Renaissance and the Enlightenment. In Schaeffer's words, "...Aquinas had opened the way to an autonomous Humanism, an autonomous philosophy, and once the movement gained momentum, there was soon a flood."<ref>Francis Schaeffer, Escape from Reason (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1968), 9-18. </ref>
+
The Christian apologist and philosopher [[Francis Schaeffer]] offered a similar indictment on Thomas Aquinas in ''Escape from Reason''. Schaeffer argued that Aquinas "separated nature from grace," and allowed for the study of the earthly realm to be entirely removed from the study of Christianity. In doing so, he "laid the groundwork for the Humanistic Renaissance" and the "autonomous individual." Schaeffer reprimanded Aquinas for his belief in the intrinsic goodness of man—a radically unconservative persuasion. Aquinas believed that, though the will was affected by the fall, the intellect was not. Thus, reasoning and philosophy became free to be pursued without subjugation to the limitations of the Scriptures and divine revelation. Schaeffer viewed Aquinas as one of the founding fathers of liberal modernity, accrediting to him some responsibility for the Renaissance and the Enlightenment. In Schaeffer's words, "...Aquinas had opened the way to an autonomous Humanism, an autonomous philosophy, and once the movement gained momentum, there was soon a flood."<ref>Francis Schaeffer, Escape from Reason (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1968), 9-18. </ref>
    
== In literature ==
 
== In literature ==
SkipCaptcha
50

edits

Navigation menu