7
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 36:
Line 36: +
Reply to content addition
I didn't want to just add the link on conservapedia.com's "Omnipotence" page without first getting some feedback from others on this matter. I'm also not sure where it could be added? I was thinking a "Links" section could be added right above the "References" section and then the link could be added there (along with other links of interest). ...Thoughts?--[[User:Birdman DSL|Birdman DSL]] ([[User talk:Birdman DSL|talk]]) 10:00, 14 October 2017 (EDT)
I didn't want to just add the link on conservapedia.com's "Omnipotence" page without first getting some feedback from others on this matter. I'm also not sure where it could be added? I was thinking a "Links" section could be added right above the "References" section and then the link could be added there (along with other links of interest). ...Thoughts?--[[User:Birdman DSL|Birdman DSL]] ([[User talk:Birdman DSL|talk]]) 10:00, 14 October 2017 (EDT)
:I added a link to your website in an external links section.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:13, 14 October 2017 (EDT)
:I added a link to your website in an external links section.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:13, 14 October 2017 (EDT)
::Thank you very much! You would not believe what I ran into over on the RationalWiki website. I had no idea that it was an agenda-driven website designed for promoting Atheism. I was shocked at the bitterness I was handed, and then I realized what I had walked into. The strange part is that none of this has anything to do with Christianity or any religious aspects at all. It's merely using the definition of omnipotence to battle a paradox that challenges omnipotence. It's more like just trying to work a metaphysical puzzle using paradoxical logic than anything else.--[[User:Birdman DSL|Birdman DSL]] ([[User talk:Birdman DSL|talk]]) 09:26, 15 October 2017 (EDT)