Changes

Conservapedia:Abuse/Archive4 (view source)

Revision as of 15:32, May 1, 2007

410 bytes added , 15:32, May 1, 2007

Line 1: Line 1: −

−

==Current Alerts==

*{{user|Pokeisthemon}} mostly hunch, but I'm sure it's a sock of Icewedge. Should be watched closely, if not pre-emptively blocked. [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 21:15, 29 April 2007 (EDT)

Line 29: Line 27:

*:Ilovebeingconservative (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 04:28, 17 April 2007) (Earliest: 04:19, 17 April 2007) [2]

*{{user|Sterile}} - 90/10 rule --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:43, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

+

*:I obviously need to remind everyone...THIS IS A WIKI. If you don't like how an article is written and believe it's too close to another site's article on the subject, then simply edit it. This shouldn't be an issue. A lot of my additions. I specifically put on the site knowing that someone will improve upon the edits I make. That's the purpose of wikis! -- [[User:AmeriCan|AmeriCan]] 11:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

::You know, I've been on here for 12 days now. And by writing this, I am condeming myself more to the 90/10 rule "violation." Am I on this list or off this list? Am I blocked or am I not blocked? I haven't been warned (except that I noticed my name here--kinda passive aggressive, but hey, I can deal), and no action has been taken. I guess I should just wait. [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 11:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

*{{user|ILikeCookies}} - not so much abusive edits as just plain fluff--doesn't quite seem appropriate. What does everybody think?

AmeriCan

469

edits