Changes

Line 37: Line 37:  
Atheists have tried to pretend that Conservapedia's atheism content is only reinforcing the opinions of Christian fundamentalists and nobody else take the material seriously. Yet, this is obviously not true.  
 
Atheists have tried to pretend that Conservapedia's atheism content is only reinforcing the opinions of Christian fundamentalists and nobody else take the material seriously. Yet, this is obviously not true.  
   −
Conservapedia was founded by [[Andy Schlafly]] who is the son of the late anti-[[feminism|feminist]] [[Phyllis Schlafly]]. Yet, even the feminist [[Monica Shores]] quoted Conservapedia's material related to the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]].  Her ''Ms. Magazine'' article titled ''Will “[[New Atheism]]” Make Room For Women?'' was one of the first articles criticizing the New Atheism movement for being [[sexism|sexist]].<ref>[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine''</ref> She also cited [[Conservapedia]] in her article and indicated: "The lack of lady presence is so visible that Conservapedia commented on it by noting that [[Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science website|Dawkins’ website]] overwhelmingly attracts male visitors."<ref>[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine''</ref>
+
Conservapedia was founded by [[Andy Schlafly]] who is the son of the late anti-[[feminism|feminist]] [[Phyllis Schlafly]]. Yet, even the feminist [[Monica Shores]] quoted Conservapedia's material related to the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]].  Pre-[[Elevatorgate]] controversy, her ''Ms. Magazine'' article titled ''Will “[[New Atheism]]” Make Room For Women?'' was one of the first articles criticizing the New Atheism movement for being [[sexism|sexist]].<ref>[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine''</ref> She also cited [[Conservapedia]] in her article and indicated: "The lack of lady presence is so visible that Conservapedia commented on it by noting that [[Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science website|Dawkins’ website]] overwhelmingly attracts male visitors."<ref>[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine''</ref>
    
== Notes ==
 
== Notes ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,796

edits