Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 35:
Line 35: − + Line 44:
Line 44: +
no edit summary
==Effects on conservative websites including Conservapedia==
==Effects on conservative websites including Conservapedia==
If not prohibited, better Internet service would be given to those websites and companies with pay more. Large corporations like CNN and ABC would be able to pay these rates, and thus become much more technologically reliable. Smaller websites, especially non-profit ones, would generally be unable to pay the increased rates. There websites would therefore become harder and slower to access, and many users could be turned away as a result. Internet traffic would eventually flow towards the better funded websites, and away from non-profit sites such as Conservapedia.
If not prohibited, better Internet service would be given to those websites and companies with pay more. Large corporations like CNN and ABC would be able to pay these rates, and thus become much more technologically reliable. Smaller websites, especially non-profit ones, would generally be unable to pay the increased rates. Their websites would, therefore, become harder and slower to access, and many users could be turned away as a result. Internet traffic would eventually flow towards the better-funded websites, and away from non-profit sites such as Conservapedia.
==References==
==References==
[[Category:Information Technology]]
[[Category:Information Technology]]
[[Category:Regulation]]