Changes

Line 34: Line 34:     
::::More on the bright side: HotelPlanner.com chose not to cut ties with the NRA,[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/28/hotelplanner-com-sticks-nra-preserves-discounted-rate-nra-members/] and Roku is refusing to censor NRATV due to its support of freedom of speech.[http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/02/28/roku-refuses-censor-nra-tv-following-mob-pressure/] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:38, 28 February 2018 (EST)
 
::::More on the bright side: HotelPlanner.com chose not to cut ties with the NRA,[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/28/hotelplanner-com-sticks-nra-preserves-discounted-rate-nra-members/] and Roku is refusing to censor NRATV due to its support of freedom of speech.[http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/02/28/roku-refuses-censor-nra-tv-following-mob-pressure/] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:38, 28 February 2018 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::That is good news! I've never heard of HotelPlanner.com, and I also can't find any political info on them.  All I found was that it is a private company, and they are looking to buy up other companies.  Roku I've heard of, but also had difficulty finding info on them.  Apparently, [https://www.2ndvote.com/business-entity/roku/ 2nd vote had the same problem].  Perhaps these two are staying mostly neutral?  Not sure--do you think either should be added based on this alone?  It seems like some pretty weak evidence.  HotelPlanner made it clear that this had nothing to do with politics, they are just sticking to the business deal. Likewise, Roku basically said that unless it breaks the rules, anything goes. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 23:30, 28 February 2018 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,387

edits