nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
→Article name: Questioning geologic column.
::::::I do hope not, as that would be on a par with believing the Earth is flat, i.e. in direct contradiction of obvious reality; It's real enough and directly observable in many places (the Grand Canyon for example). What creationists have is a different explanation for how it came about. --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 05:42, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
::::::I do hope not, as that would be on a par with believing the Earth is flat, i.e. in direct contradiction of obvious reality; It's real enough and directly observable in many places (the Grand Canyon for example). What creationists have is a different explanation for how it came about. --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 05:42, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::::I'm not sure what the best wording would be, and they don't question that the rocks exist, but they are questioning more than just how it formed. I ''think'' they question that there really are common strata that can be identified world-wide, or something along those lines. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:55, 3 May 2007 (EDT)