Changes

Gleichschaltung (view source)

Revision as of 16:59, September 26, 2018

7 bytes added , 16:59, September 26, 2018

m

HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://books.google.com → https://books.google.com (6), http://thefederalist.com → https://thefederalist.com

Line 11: Line 11:

<div style="padding-left:40px;">— Wilhelm Busch<ref name="Busch">{{cite book |title=Jesus our destiny |author=Wilhelm Busch |year=2001 |publisher=Brunen Publishing |place=Basel, Switzerland |page=34 |isbn=0-86347-024-6 |url= }}</ref> </div>

|}

−

'''Gleichschaltung''' (meaning ''"coordination"'', ''"making the same"'', ''"bringing into line"'')<ref>{{cite web |title=www.princeton.edu |publisher=https://www.princeton.edu |url=https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Gleichschaltung.html |accessdate=December 6, 2014}}</ref> was the [[Nazi]] policy enforcing [[politically correct|political conformity]] in all sectors of society, from the economy and trade associations to the media, culture and education.<ref>{{cite web |title='Only a Phase': How Diplomats Misjudged Hitler's Rise |author=Christoph Strupp |publisher=Spiegel Online International |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/marking-eighty-years-since-hitler-took-power-in-germany-a-880565.html |accessdate=December 6, 2014}}</ref> It is an example from the early days of the Nazi [[dictatorship]] of developing its own twisted and distorted language{{#tag:ref|cf. ''"Together with new methods and a new morality they have introduced also a '''new vocabulary''' into Europe."'' Duff Cooper, [[House of Commons]], October 3, 1938 (After [[Munich Agreement]]); See Also [[Disturbed character|Examples: Politics: Peace for our time vs. The first foretaste of a bitter cup]]|group=note}} used to [[psychological manipulation|manipulate]] and confuse citizens of a [[totalitarian]] state so that they no longer can distinguish [[truth]] from [[falsehood]]. Consequently, they are reduced to such a state of confusion{{#tag:ref|cf. "The well-known English author, [[Somerset Maugham]], wrote an important book entitled: ''Of Human Bondage''. How easily men let themselves live in a state of subjection. You older people can remember how you submitted to [[Hitler]]. 'I believed that two multiplied by two made twenty,' many have since admitted. 'I believed it because the [[Führer]] had said so!'"<ref name="Busch">{{cite book |title=Jesus our destiny |author=Wilhelm Busch |year=2001 |publisher=Brunen Publishing |place=Basel, Switzerland |page=34|isbn=0-86347-024-6 |url= }}</ref> |group=note}} and impotence that the dictatorial government can control their hearts and minds. [[George Orwell]]’s famous books [[1984]] and [[Animal Farm]] are the classic fictional and symbolic statements addressing this aspect of totalitarianism.{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Newspeak]]|group=note}} The Ministry of Propaganda established by [[Joseph Goebbels]], best known for his media and social [[Psychological manipulation|manipulation]] in [[Nazi]] [[Germany]],<ref name="Bergman2012">{{cite book |title=Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview: How the Nazi Eugenic Crusade for a Superior Race Caused the Greatest Holocaust in World History |author=Jerry Bergman |publisher=Joshua Press |year=2012 |pages=194–5 |isbn=978-1-894400-49-7 |url=~~http~~://books.google.com/books?id=K2bFMgEACAAJ |quote=Goebbels...His chief propaganda theory was "the Big Lie": if something is repeated often enough, people will believe it no matter how false. This technique worked very well in disenfranchising Jews.}}</ref> is used as model for the Ministry of Truth in the [[1984|1984 book]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Nazi Gleichschaltung |author=Edgar Feuchtwanger |publisher=The new perspective journal |volume=7 |number= 2 |url=http://www.history-ontheweb.co.uk/concepts/concept72_gleichschaltung.htm |accessdate=December 6, 2014}}</ref> Orwell reasoned that if a government could control all media and interpersonal communication while simultaneously forcing citizens to speak in politically controlled jargon, it could blunt independent thinking.<ref>{{cite web |url=~~http~~://thefederalist.com/2014/06/23/how-the-trans-agenda-seeks-to-redefine-everyone/ |author=Stella Morabito |title=How The Trans-Agenda Seeks To Redefine Everyone |date=24 June 2014 |accessdate=16 April 2016}}</ref> One of the key figures in the process of Gleichschaltung that established the Nazi dictatorship was [[Hermann Göring]], who in 1933 banned all Roman Catholic newspapers in [[Germany]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Hermann Göring, "The Iron Knight" |publisher=www.HolocaustResearchProject.org |url=http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/goering.html |accessdate=5 June 2015 |quote=Georing had joined the Reichstag in 1928, and subsequently became the parliament's president from 1932 to 1933, he was one of the key figures in the process of Gleichschaltung that established the Nazi dictatorship. For example, in 1933 he banned all [[Roman Catholic]] newspapers in Germany, despite the support the Centre Party had given to Hitler's chancellorship.}}</ref> When gleichschaltung is applied into the realms of [[science]], it transforms science into [[scientism]]. The twisted scientific methods and self-serving research are then used to support particular political agenda of the party or [[pressure group]] having special interests.

+

'''Gleichschaltung''' (meaning ''"coordination"'', ''"making the same"'', ''"bringing into line"'')<ref>{{cite web |title=www.princeton.edu |publisher=https://www.princeton.edu |url=https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Gleichschaltung.html |accessdate=December 6, 2014}}</ref> was the [[Nazi]] policy enforcing [[politically correct|political conformity]] in all sectors of society, from the economy and trade associations to the media, culture and education.<ref>{{cite web |title='Only a Phase': How Diplomats Misjudged Hitler's Rise |author=Christoph Strupp |publisher=Spiegel Online International |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/marking-eighty-years-since-hitler-took-power-in-germany-a-880565.html |accessdate=December 6, 2014}}</ref> It is an example from the early days of the Nazi [[dictatorship]] of developing its own twisted and distorted language{{#tag:ref|cf. ''"Together with new methods and a new morality they have introduced also a '''new vocabulary''' into Europe."'' Duff Cooper, [[House of Commons]], October 3, 1938 (After [[Munich Agreement]]); See Also [[Disturbed character|Examples: Politics: Peace for our time vs. The first foretaste of a bitter cup]]|group=note}} used to [[psychological manipulation|manipulate]] and confuse citizens of a [[totalitarian]] state so that they no longer can distinguish [[truth]] from [[falsehood]]. Consequently, they are reduced to such a state of confusion{{#tag:ref|cf. "The well-known English author, [[Somerset Maugham]], wrote an important book entitled: ''Of Human Bondage''. How easily men let themselves live in a state of subjection. You older people can remember how you submitted to [[Hitler]]. 'I believed that two multiplied by two made twenty,' many have since admitted. 'I believed it because the [[Führer]] had said so!'"<ref name="Busch">{{cite book |title=Jesus our destiny |author=Wilhelm Busch |year=2001 |publisher=Brunen Publishing |place=Basel, Switzerland |page=34|isbn=0-86347-024-6 |url= }}</ref> |group=note}} and impotence that the dictatorial government can control their hearts and minds. [[George Orwell]]’s famous books [[1984]] and [[Animal Farm]] are the classic fictional and symbolic statements addressing this aspect of totalitarianism.{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Newspeak]]|group=note}} The Ministry of Propaganda established by [[Joseph Goebbels]], best known for his media and social [[Psychological manipulation|manipulation]] in [[Nazi]] [[Germany]],<ref name="Bergman2012">{{cite book |title=Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview: How the Nazi Eugenic Crusade for a Superior Race Caused the Greatest Holocaust in World History |author=Jerry Bergman |publisher=Joshua Press |year=2012 |pages=194–5 |isbn=978-1-894400-49-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K2bFMgEACAAJ |quote=Goebbels...His chief propaganda theory was "the Big Lie": if something is repeated often enough, people will believe it no matter how false. This technique worked very well in disenfranchising Jews.}}</ref> is used as model for the Ministry of Truth in the [[1984|1984 book]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Nazi Gleichschaltung |author=Edgar Feuchtwanger |publisher=The new perspective journal |volume=7 |number= 2 |url=http://www.history-ontheweb.co.uk/concepts/concept72_gleichschaltung.htm |accessdate=December 6, 2014}}</ref> Orwell reasoned that if a government could control all media and interpersonal communication while simultaneously forcing citizens to speak in politically controlled jargon, it could blunt independent thinking.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://thefederalist.com/2014/06/23/how-the-trans-agenda-seeks-to-redefine-everyone/ |author=Stella Morabito |title=How The Trans-Agenda Seeks To Redefine Everyone |date=24 June 2014 |accessdate=16 April 2016}}</ref> One of the key figures in the process of Gleichschaltung that established the Nazi dictatorship was [[Hermann Göring]], who in 1933 banned all Roman Catholic newspapers in [[Germany]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Hermann Göring, "The Iron Knight" |publisher=www.HolocaustResearchProject.org |url=http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/goering.html |accessdate=5 June 2015 |quote=Georing had joined the Reichstag in 1928, and subsequently became the parliament's president from 1932 to 1933, he was one of the key figures in the process of Gleichschaltung that established the Nazi dictatorship. For example, in 1933 he banned all [[Roman Catholic]] newspapers in Germany, despite the support the Centre Party had given to Hitler's chancellorship.}}</ref> When gleichschaltung is applied into the realms of [[science]], it transforms science into [[scientism]]. The twisted scientific methods and self-serving research are then used to support particular political agenda of the party or [[pressure group]] having special interests.

==Key figures==

Line 37: Line 37:

|url=

|language=Slovak

−

}}</ref> [[LGBT]]I campaigners have been using the language of rights<ref name="Sprigg2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=BC07I01 |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their [[caboose]] to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). The |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref> in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires.{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBT+ bundling]]|group=note}} In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law given not by parliaments but created from judicial bench by means of [[judicial activism]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Gay marriage is not a 'human right': European ruling torpedoes Coalition stance |author=Steve Doughty |publisher=Associated Newspapers Ltd; Part of the Daily Mail |date=20 March 2012 |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117920/Gay-marriage-human-right-European-ruling-torpedoes-Coalition-stance.html |quote=Norman Wells, of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘For too long campaigners have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. ‘In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law. ‘We are seeing the same principle at work in the Government’s sham of a consultation on same-sex marriage.’ He added: ‘The ruling from the ECHR will embolden those whose concerns about same-sex marriage and adoption are not inspired by personal hatred and animosity, but by a genuine concern for the well-being of children and the welfare of society. ‘Instead of rushing to legislate without seriously considering the views of the electorate, the Government should be encouraging a measured public debate on the nature and meaning of marriage.’ |accessdate=11 October 2015}}</ref> In [[Roman law]] this type of judicial activity made for the purpose of fullfiling the sensual lust and sexual bodily urges was titled ''Libidinis causa''. The legal causes outwardly pretending the just cause but in fact hiding the real intentions and will of their originators were termed in [[Latin]] as ''Dissimulatio'' and Servius (Ulp. D.4,3,1,2) labeled them as [[deception]] (''dolorum malum'').<ref>{{cite book |author=Karol Rebro |title=Latinské právnicke výrazy a výroky |publisher=Iura edition |year=1995 |pages=100–1, 173 |isbn=80-88715-20-2 |url=~~http~~://books.google.com/books?id=I54hPQAACAAJ |quote=za účelom žiadostivosti, zmyselnosti |language=Slovak}}</ref> [[Francis Bacon]] regarded as negative phenomenon the ''dissimulation'' when a man lets fall signs and arguments, that he is not, that he is [here: [[Human being]] belonging to [[humankind]] that consists of two complementary [[sex]]es — [[male]] and [[female]]{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Gedankenexperiment#Marriage vs. Homosexual Life-style]] and [[Natural order]]|group=note}}]; and called as ''simulation'' the situation when a man industriously and expressly feigns and pretends to be [here: LGBT+{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Ideomotor effect]]|group=note}}], that he is not.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.authorama.com/essays-of-francis-bacon-7.html |author=Francis Bacon |title=Essays of Francis Bacon:Of Simulation and Dissimulation |quote=There be three degrees of this hiding and veiling of a man’s self. The first, closeness, reservation, and secrecy; when a man leaveth himself without observation, or without hold to be taken, what he is. The second, dissimulation, in the negative; when a man lets fall signs and arguments, that he is not, that he is. And the third, simulation, in the affirmative; when a man industriously and expressly feigns and pretends to be, that he is not.|accessdate=9 Jul 2016}}</ref>

+

}}</ref> [[LGBT]]I campaigners have been using the language of rights<ref name="Sprigg2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=BC07I01 |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their [[caboose]] to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). The |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref> in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires.{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBT+ bundling]]|group=note}} In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law given not by parliaments but created from judicial bench by means of [[judicial activism]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Gay marriage is not a 'human right': European ruling torpedoes Coalition stance |author=Steve Doughty |publisher=Associated Newspapers Ltd; Part of the Daily Mail |date=20 March 2012 |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117920/Gay-marriage-human-right-European-ruling-torpedoes-Coalition-stance.html |quote=Norman Wells, of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘For too long campaigners have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. ‘In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law. ‘We are seeing the same principle at work in the Government’s sham of a consultation on same-sex marriage.’ He added: ‘The ruling from the ECHR will embolden those whose concerns about same-sex marriage and adoption are not inspired by personal hatred and animosity, but by a genuine concern for the well-being of children and the welfare of society. ‘Instead of rushing to legislate without seriously considering the views of the electorate, the Government should be encouraging a measured public debate on the nature and meaning of marriage.’ |accessdate=11 October 2015}}</ref> In [[Roman law]] this type of judicial activity made for the purpose of fullfiling the sensual lust and sexual bodily urges was titled ''Libidinis causa''. The legal causes outwardly pretending the just cause but in fact hiding the real intentions and will of their originators were termed in [[Latin]] as ''Dissimulatio'' and Servius (Ulp. D.4,3,1,2) labeled them as [[deception]] (''dolorum malum'').<ref>{{cite book |author=Karol Rebro |title=Latinské právnicke výrazy a výroky |publisher=Iura edition |year=1995 |pages=100–1, 173 |isbn=80-88715-20-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I54hPQAACAAJ |quote=za účelom žiadostivosti, zmyselnosti |language=Slovak}}</ref> [[Francis Bacon]] regarded as negative phenomenon the ''dissimulation'' when a man lets fall signs and arguments, that he is not, that he is [here: [[Human being]] belonging to [[humankind]] that consists of two complementary [[sex]]es — [[male]] and [[female]]{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Gedankenexperiment#Marriage vs. Homosexual Life-style]] and [[Natural order]]|group=note}}]; and called as ''simulation'' the situation when a man industriously and expressly feigns and pretends to be [here: LGBT+{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Ideomotor effect]]|group=note}}], that he is not.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.authorama.com/essays-of-francis-bacon-7.html |author=Francis Bacon |title=Essays of Francis Bacon:Of Simulation and Dissimulation |quote=There be three degrees of this hiding and veiling of a man’s self. The first, closeness, reservation, and secrecy; when a man leaveth himself without observation, or without hold to be taken, what he is. The second, dissimulation, in the negative; when a man lets fall signs and arguments, that he is not, that he is. And the third, simulation, in the affirmative; when a man industriously and expressly feigns and pretends to be, that he is not.|accessdate=9 Jul 2016}}</ref>

In his short [[satiric]] video sketch titled ''Modern Educayshun'', Neel Kolhatkar shows how policies of LGBTI Gleichschltung disguised under the label of [[Gender equality]] delve into the potential dangers of modern increasingly reactionary culture bred by social media and [[political correctness]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Modern Educayshun |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKcWu0tsiZM&feature=youtu.be |author=Neel Kolhatkar |accessdate=6 December 2015}}</ref>

Line 43: Line 43:

=== The most frequent terms in LGBTI gleichschaltung ===

==== "[[Gay rights]]" ====

−

LGBTI lobbyists make efforts to equate sodomy, a pattern of perverse behavior between people of same sex involving anal or oral sex, with a civil right.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sodomy is not a civil right |url=http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2vyqzf |quote=“Sodomy is not a civil rights movement...Sodomy is not a civil right, and there’s an effort by homosexual lobbyists to equate the two. That’s wrong. It is a pattern of behavior.”|accessdate=2 june 2016}}</ref><ref name="FRC2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF07K01.pdf |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their caboose to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref><ref name="Sprigg2004">{{cite book |title=Outrage: How Gay Activists and Liberal Judges are Trashing Democracy to Redefine Marriage |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Regnery |year=2004 |place=Washington, D.C. |isbn= 978-08952-60215 |url= ~~http~~://books.google.com/books?id=2HqwAAAAIAAJ |quote=…the Supreme Court has never declared sexual orientation to be a protected class under civil rights laws… }}</ref> This [[psychological manipulation|manipulative]] effort often involves trickery that can be called ''[[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBTI Bundling]]'', tactic of wrapping practitioners of perverse sexual behavior in the cloak of civil rights by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. In [[Bowers v. Hardwick]], the [[US Supreme Court]] ruled, that claiming, as LGBTI advocates do,<ref name="William Eskridge">{{cite web |url=http://wtvr.com/2012/05/18/marshall-sodomy-is-not-a-civil-rights-movement/ |title=Marshall: ‘Sodomy is not a civil right’ |author=Wtvrerikaneddenien |publisher=WTVR |date=18 May 2012 |quote=William Eskridge, a Yale Law School professor, has spoken out against Marshall's statement, saying sodomy is, in a practical sense, a civil right--according to the Supreme Court...“The Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence that anal or oral sex, commonly known as sodomy, when performed in private by consenting adults, is constitutionally protected -- which makes it a civil right,” Eskridge told MSNBC. |accessdate=2 June 2016}}</ref> a right to engage in sodomitical [[Behavior|conduct]] and argue that it is ''"deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition"'' or ''"implicit in the concept of ordered liberty"'', is, at best, facetious. The [[U.S. Constitution]] does not confer a fundamental right upon [[homosexuals]] to engage in sodomy.

+

LGBTI lobbyists make efforts to equate sodomy, a pattern of perverse behavior between people of same sex involving anal or oral sex, with a civil right.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sodomy is not a civil right |url=http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2vyqzf |quote=“Sodomy is not a civil rights movement...Sodomy is not a civil right, and there’s an effort by homosexual lobbyists to equate the two. That’s wrong. It is a pattern of behavior.”|accessdate=2 june 2016}}</ref><ref name="FRC2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF07K01.pdf |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their caboose to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref><ref name="Sprigg2004">{{cite book |title=Outrage: How Gay Activists and Liberal Judges are Trashing Democracy to Redefine Marriage |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Regnery |year=2004 |place=Washington, D.C. |isbn= 978-08952-60215 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=2HqwAAAAIAAJ |quote=…the Supreme Court has never declared sexual orientation to be a protected class under civil rights laws… }}</ref> This [[psychological manipulation|manipulative]] effort often involves trickery that can be called ''[[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBTI Bundling]]'', tactic of wrapping practitioners of perverse sexual behavior in the cloak of civil rights by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. In [[Bowers v. Hardwick]], the [[US Supreme Court]] ruled, that claiming, as LGBTI advocates do,<ref name="William Eskridge">{{cite web |url=http://wtvr.com/2012/05/18/marshall-sodomy-is-not-a-civil-rights-movement/ |title=Marshall: ‘Sodomy is not a civil right’ |author=Wtvrerikaneddenien |publisher=WTVR |date=18 May 2012 |quote=William Eskridge, a Yale Law School professor, has spoken out against Marshall's statement, saying sodomy is, in a practical sense, a civil right--according to the Supreme Court...“The Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence that anal or oral sex, commonly known as sodomy, when performed in private by consenting adults, is constitutionally protected -- which makes it a civil right,” Eskridge told MSNBC. |accessdate=2 June 2016}}</ref> a right to engage in sodomitical [[Behavior|conduct]] and argue that it is ''"deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition"'' or ''"implicit in the concept of ordered liberty"'', is, at best, facetious. The [[U.S. Constitution]] does not confer a fundamental right upon [[homosexuals]] to engage in sodomy.

==== Sexual orientation ====

''See Also:'' [[Sexual orientation theory]]

−

The term ''[[Sexual orientation]]'' is used by “gay” activists to deceive both policy makers and the public about the nature of [[homosexuality]], which should be more accurately termed a ''[[sexual disorientation]]''.{{#tag:ref|Disorientation is the opposite of orientation. In more general sense, it is a cognitive disability in which the senses of time, direction, and recognition of items (things), people and places become difficult to distinguish/identify<ref>{{cite book |author=Isaac M., Janca A., Sartious N. |year=1994 |title=ICD-10 Symptom Glossery For Mental Disorders |edition=10 |publisher=WHO |url=http://www.who.int/}}</ref> and can be due to various conditions, e.g. from delirium<ref>{{cite web |title=Delirium |publisher=Patient, the independent health platform |url=http://patient.info/doctor/delirium-pro |accessdate=14 Feb 2016}}</ref> to intoxication. Typically, disorientation is first in time, then in place and finally in person.<ref>{{cite book |author=Berrios G. E. |year=1982 |title=Disorientation States in Psychiatry. |journal=Comprehensive Psychiatry |issue=23 |pages=479–491 |url=http://www.journals.elsevier.com/comprehensive-psychiatry/}}</ref> Mental disorientation is closely related, and often intermixed with trauma shock, including physical shock. In case of sexual disorientation, the cognitive disability pertains to recognition of own [[sexual identity]], it can also be fueled by delirium<ref>{{cite web |title=Drunk Danes - Gay parade (18+; Parental Supervision is Advised) |date=7 Jan 2008 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=so5SNSh12io |accessdate=14 Feb 2016}}</ref> and intoxication,<ref name="Yuan's Book">{{cite book |title=christopheryuan |year=2011 |publisher=WaterBrook Press |pages=82 |url=~~http~~://books.google.com/books?id=g3KR3nFcl1oC |isbn=978-0-307-72935-4 |quote=I felt like we had become one - our souls enmeshed. But in reality, much of the passion between us was fueled by Ecstasy - thus our relationship was fierce and intense, both good and bad.}}</ref> and finally ends up in difficulties to properly distinguish/identify a person normal to mate with (i.e. focusing on individual(s) or object(s) other than person of the opposite sex of legal age instead, See Also: [[Paraphilia]]). With respect to sexual disorientation, the trauma shock often comes from [[child molestation]] or [[Sexual abuse being a contributing factor for homosexuality|sexual abuse]],<ref>{{cite journal |title=Childhood sexual abuse among homosexual men. Prevalence and association with unsafe sex. |author=Lenderking WR et al. |journal=J Gen Intern Med. |date=12 Apr 1997 |issue=4 |pages=250–3 |url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9127231 |quote=Of 327 homosexual and bisexual men participating in an ongoing cohort study pertaining to risk factors for HIV infection who completed a survey regarding history of sexual abuse, 116 (35.5%) reported being sexually abused as children. Those abused were more likely to have more lifetime male partners, to report more childhood stress, to have lied in the past in order to have sex, and to have had unprotected receptive anal intercourse in the past 6 months (odds ratio 2.13; 95% confidence interval 1.15-3.95). Sexual abuse remained a significant predictor of unprotected receptive anal intercourse in a logistic model adjusting for potential confounding variables. |accessdate=14 Feb 2016}}</ref> respectively. Sexual disorientation can be the aim of [[pressure group]]s spreadding the [[homosexual agenda]], in order to deliberately augment the misinterpretation of [[same-sex attraction]]s among children and young people by misusing the [[ideomotor effect]].|group=note}} The LGBTI, or gender nonsensical theory about [[sexuality]] was invented by “gay” political strategists to serve their own selfish interests at the expense of the welfare of society as a whole. It helps to frame the debate about homosexuality in such a way that the average person is tricked into accepting “gay” presuppositions without challenge and even those people who continue to oppose the homosexuals’ political goals start using their twisted language. Once the presuppositions have been accepted, especially when they become “law” in so called "anti-discrimination" policies, resistance to rest of [[Homosexual Agenda|the “gay” agenda]] becomes much more difficult.

+

The term ''[[Sexual orientation]]'' is used by “gay” activists to deceive both policy makers and the public about the nature of [[homosexuality]], which should be more accurately termed a ''[[sexual disorientation]]''.{{#tag:ref|Disorientation is the opposite of orientation. In more general sense, it is a cognitive disability in which the senses of time, direction, and recognition of items (things), people and places become difficult to distinguish/identify<ref>{{cite book |author=Isaac M., Janca A., Sartious N. |year=1994 |title=ICD-10 Symptom Glossery For Mental Disorders |edition=10 |publisher=WHO |url=http://www.who.int/}}</ref> and can be due to various conditions, e.g. from delirium<ref>{{cite web |title=Delirium |publisher=Patient, the independent health platform |url=http://patient.info/doctor/delirium-pro |accessdate=14 Feb 2016}}</ref> to intoxication. Typically, disorientation is first in time, then in place and finally in person.<ref>{{cite book |author=Berrios G. E. |year=1982 |title=Disorientation States in Psychiatry. |journal=Comprehensive Psychiatry |issue=23 |pages=479–491 |url=http://www.journals.elsevier.com/comprehensive-psychiatry/}}</ref> Mental disorientation is closely related, and often intermixed with trauma shock, including physical shock. In case of sexual disorientation, the cognitive disability pertains to recognition of own [[sexual identity]], it can also be fueled by delirium<ref>{{cite web |title=Drunk Danes - Gay parade (18+; Parental Supervision is Advised) |date=7 Jan 2008 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=so5SNSh12io |accessdate=14 Feb 2016}}</ref> and intoxication,<ref name="Yuan's Book">{{cite book |title=christopheryuan |year=2011 |publisher=WaterBrook Press |pages=82 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=g3KR3nFcl1oC |isbn=978-0-307-72935-4 |quote=I felt like we had become one - our souls enmeshed. But in reality, much of the passion between us was fueled by Ecstasy - thus our relationship was fierce and intense, both good and bad.}}</ref> and finally ends up in difficulties to properly distinguish/identify a person normal to mate with (i.e. focusing on individual(s) or object(s) other than person of the opposite sex of legal age instead, See Also: [[Paraphilia]]). With respect to sexual disorientation, the trauma shock often comes from [[child molestation]] or [[Sexual abuse being a contributing factor for homosexuality|sexual abuse]],<ref>{{cite journal |title=Childhood sexual abuse among homosexual men. Prevalence and association with unsafe sex. |author=Lenderking WR et al. |journal=J Gen Intern Med. |date=12 Apr 1997 |issue=4 |pages=250–3 |url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9127231 |quote=Of 327 homosexual and bisexual men participating in an ongoing cohort study pertaining to risk factors for HIV infection who completed a survey regarding history of sexual abuse, 116 (35.5%) reported being sexually abused as children. Those abused were more likely to have more lifetime male partners, to report more childhood stress, to have lied in the past in order to have sex, and to have had unprotected receptive anal intercourse in the past 6 months (odds ratio 2.13; 95% confidence interval 1.15-3.95). Sexual abuse remained a significant predictor of unprotected receptive anal intercourse in a logistic model adjusting for potential confounding variables. |accessdate=14 Feb 2016}}</ref> respectively. Sexual disorientation can be the aim of [[pressure group]]s spreadding the [[homosexual agenda]], in order to deliberately augment the misinterpretation of [[same-sex attraction]]s among children and young people by misusing the [[ideomotor effect]].|group=note}} The LGBTI, or gender nonsensical theory about [[sexuality]] was invented by “gay” political strategists to serve their own selfish interests at the expense of the welfare of society as a whole. It helps to frame the debate about homosexuality in such a way that the average person is tricked into accepting “gay” presuppositions without challenge and even those people who continue to oppose the homosexuals’ political goals start using their twisted language. Once the presuppositions have been accepted, especially when they become “law” in so called "anti-discrimination" policies, resistance to rest of [[Homosexual Agenda|the “gay” agenda]] becomes much more difficult.

The only effective counter-strategy is to reject and refute the false assumptions of sexual orientation and re-frame the issues on a truthful foundation.<ref name="Lively2009">{{cite book |title=Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda |author=Scott Lively |publisher=Veritas Aeterna Press |place=Springfield, MA |year=2009 |edition=1 (Version 1.1)|pages=6, 104 |url=http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/Redeeming_rainbow}} See [[Scott Lively]].</ref>

Line 56: Line 56:

|-

| style="padding:15px;" | In 1966, while sitting in a bathtub after smoking half a [[Cannabis|joint]], Weinberger felt illuminated: ''"This is a f**king phobia!"'' Later, in 1971, he published ''Society and the Healthy Homosexual'', which defined the ''"homophobia"'' condition as ''"the dread of being in close quarters with homosexuals."''

−

<div style="padding-left:40px;">—About George Wienberg, "expert" of "gay liberation movement"<ref name="EISENBACH2006">{{cite book |title=Gay Power: An American Revolution |author=David Eisenbach |publisher=Carroll & Graf |place=New York |year=2006 |pages=182–3 |isbn=978-07867-16333 |url=~~http~~://books.google.com/books?id=0NeGAAAAIAAJ |quote=The term "homophobia" was coined by George Weinberg...}}</ref> </div>

+

<div style="padding-left:40px;">—About George Wienberg, "expert" of "gay liberation movement"<ref name="EISENBACH2006">{{cite book |title=Gay Power: An American Revolution |author=David Eisenbach |publisher=Carroll & Graf |place=New York |year=2006 |pages=182–3 |isbn=978-07867-16333 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0NeGAAAAIAAJ |quote=The term "homophobia" was coined by George Weinberg...}}</ref> </div>

|}

[[Homophobia]] is an obscure psychiatric term originally coined to define “a person’s fear of his or her own [[same-sex attraction]].” It has been redefined and misused by the political strategists of the “gay” movement such as [[George Weinberg]] in order to ostracize all disapproval of homosexuality as a form of hatred and fear akin to [[mental illness]] (a [[phobia]] is an anxiety disorder). The word “homophobia” is today not a scientific term, but a propaganda tool for [[psychological manipulation]]. As a rhetorical weapon, it serves:

Line 62: Line 62:

*the term can be used as the semantic equivalent of “racist,” helping the “gay” movement further indoctrinate the public with the notion that opposition to homosexuality is equivalent to prejudice against racial minorities

*collectively, the word “homophobia” serves pro-“gay” advocates to intimidate opponents into silence.

−

*Smith maintains that it can be regarded as a form of defence mechanism, a sort of [[psychological manipulation|guilt-shifting trickery]] which is adopted immediately when initiator of this label comes short of arguments thus tries to sabotage any rational discourse<ref name="Smith1993">{{cite book |title=Sodom's second coming |author=Frank LaGard Smith |publisher=Harvest House Publishers|place=Eugene, Oregon |year=1993 |pages=29 |isbn=978-15650-71544 |url=~~http~~://books.google.com/books?redir_esc=y&id=G-U4b1FqhygC |quote=the page number is from 2004 Czech translation}}</ref>

+

*Smith maintains that it can be regarded as a form of defence mechanism, a sort of [[psychological manipulation|guilt-shifting trickery]] which is adopted immediately when initiator of this label comes short of arguments thus tries to sabotage any rational discourse<ref name="Smith1993">{{cite book |title=Sodom's second coming |author=Frank LaGard Smith |publisher=Harvest House Publishers|place=Eugene, Oregon |year=1993 |pages=29 |isbn=978-15650-71544 |url=https://books.google.com/books?redir_esc=y&id=G-U4b1FqhygC |quote=the page number is from 2004 Czech translation}}</ref>

When any expression of opposition to homosexuality alias sodomy draws the accusation that one is a mentally-ill bigot equivalent to a racist, few people will venture to express their opposition to sodomical lifestyle publicly. Those who still will do, will also tend to be defensive, offering the disclaimer that they are not hateful, thus unintentionally but implicitly validating the lie that hatefulness and not valid objections is the general rule. The solution countering this LGBTI gleichschaltung is to reject the term “homophobia” itself as harmful and illegitimate. Its illegitimacy can be exposed by making the "gay" sophists define the term with emphasis on the distinction between "homophobia" and non-homophobic opposition to sodomical lifestyle based on presenting valid arguments, such as, for example, scientific [[Gedankenexperiment#Marriage vs. Homosexual Life-style|thought experiments]]. They will reveal that they accept no opposition to their agenda as legitimate.{{#tag:ref|The “gays” outrageous mistreatment of Miss California 2009, [[Carrie Prejean]], for simply giving her opinion that [[marriage]] should be between a man and a woman is illustrative of this fact.|group=note}}

DavidB4-bot

Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt

58,635

edits