Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,471
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 175:
Line 175: +
→Back on Topic...: Ah ha!
:Why didn't Mr. Weinberg & Al Goldstein, way back when, use "homosexism" then, if it means discriminition? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:06, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:Why didn't Mr. Weinberg & Al Goldstein, way back when, use "homosexism" then, if it means discriminition? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:06, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
Ask them! Probably because "homosexism" doesn't sound as good, and muddled the issue with women's rights, which as a movement was not doing so well at the time, and would no doubt do better on its own. Imputing an invidious reason is just paranoid.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 16:08, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
Ask them! Probably because "homosexism" doesn't sound as good, and muddled the issue with women's rights, which as a movement was not doing so well at the time, and would no doubt do better on its own. Imputing an invidious reason is just paranoid.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 16:08, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:Ah ha! So we have it right there! An admission they used a medical term to promote a politcal agenda. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:10, 6 May 2007 (EDT)