:*[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/secularoutpost/2013/09/17/wielenbergs-divine-lies-and-mcbrayer-and-swensons-response-my-comments-for-feedback Wielenberg's Divine Lies, and McBrayer and Swenson's response - my comments for feedback (patheos.com)] —"''Weilenberg’s point is that, if skeptical theism is true, it is not just possible God is lying to us: for all we know God is lying to us. So skeptical theism has the consequence that we should distrust God’s assertions.''" | :*[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/secularoutpost/2013/09/17/wielenbergs-divine-lies-and-mcbrayer-and-swensons-response-my-comments-for-feedback Wielenberg's Divine Lies, and McBrayer and Swenson's response - my comments for feedback (patheos.com)] —"''Weilenberg’s point is that, if skeptical theism is true, it is not just possible God is lying to us: for all we know God is lying to us. So skeptical theism has the consequence that we should distrust God’s assertions.''" |