25
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + +
→Relation to International Affairs: Nuclear Detente
:They're what I learned in Schelling's book "Strategy of Conflict," and in polisci seminars.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
:They're what I learned in Schelling's book "Strategy of Conflict," and in polisci seminars.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
::It doesn't make sense to me if A defects and B cooperates A will get 0 and B will get 5. If the U.S. were to nuke USSR and USSR cooperated who would end up winning? Because right now it looks like USSR would win. --[[User:Spyder|Spyder]] 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
== Censoring? ==
== Censoring? ==
Are we really censoring "tit for tat" to "t*t for tat"? That seems... a little... overboard?-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Are we really censoring "tit for tat" to "t*t for tat"? That seems... a little... overboard?-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)