34
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Debate:Listing the Earth's most pressing needs in urgent order of fixing (view source)
Revision as of 20:51, May 8, 2007
, 20:51, May 8, 2007no edit summary
To save humanity, we should focus on the worst first. --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 23:30, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
1) hunger 2) preventable disease 3) unsolved diseases like AIDS 4) natural resources 5) preventing war 6) poverty ..... 19) global warming 20) asteroid striking Earth.
1) overpopulation 2) preventing war 3) preventable disease 4) natural resource protection .... 19) maintaining American sovereignty over the world 20) asteroid striking Earth. My quick 0.02, arbitraged through the Euro. [[User:Human|Human]] 00:19, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
1) totalitarianism/world government 2) global warming 3) pandemic risk 4) US national debt 5) genocide [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:22, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
1) terrorism 2) Communism 3) genocide 4) Hunger/Poverty (not the government's job however)... 19) US national debt ..... 267) natural resources ..... 1,532) asteroid striking earth ..... 7,854,238) alien invasion 7,854,239) global warming. --[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 00:31, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
1) preventing gay marriage 2) preventing abortion 3) putting the 10 commandments in schools 4) convincing the global scientific community that evolution is false 5) defeating terrorism indefinitely and continuously 6) stopping liberals 7) keeping guns 8) stopping socialised health care 9) preventing environmentalist lies from damaging America's economy 10) making the speed of light more scriptural 11) abolishing public education 12) promoting conservative facts
1) Rejection of God. Solve that one and the rest would fall into place. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:17, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
1)Prevent global warming, by finding alternative (read:wind, solar, hydrogen, and, if it ever appears, fusion) sources of energy.
2) Stop, and reverse, the deleterious effect that free trade and international repression has had on developing African and Asia countries.
3) Enshrine the [[UDHR]], the effective culmination of 12,000 years of thought from various religions and philosophies, into national law throughout the world. Give the UN a credible way of enforcing this which is independent of [[Russia|various]] [[USA|national]] [[China|interests]]. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]</sup>
::: Yikes, add mind control--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 18:03, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
1) Poverty (people with money tend not to go hungry). 2) Wider, deeper democracy in all countries. 3) Preventable disease. 4) Alternative energy sources. 5) Be generally nicer to each other. --[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 10:52, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
(1) Homosexuality; (2) Lack of acceptance of Jesus Christ as the one Lord, our God and Saviour; (3) Buttsex; (4) Hippies; (5) People who don't like chocolate sprinkles (I had a hard time ordering 4 and 5); (6) Brown people.--[[User:mittromney|mittromney]] 4:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
1) Wealth Distribution 2) Global Warming 3) UN given greater powers 4) Save as many species as possible 5) Gun control [[User:50something|50something]]
::: What's wrong with wealth distribution? Don't you want people to have incentives to work hard? Global warming is a phantom. Do I even have to go into the total and complete worthlessness of the UN? Why would you want an organization that promotes fascism and homosexuality to be more powerful? I may most strongly disagree with you on (4). Who are you to think that some species deserve to live even though God obviously put them in a place where they are destined to die out? Isn't that hubris of the worst kind? "I think God did a bad job with this species and it's up to me to come in and make sure what should happen to it, should God's plan be brought to fruition, in fact does not?" And then gun control: Let me guess, once we repeal the second amendment, we should just go ahead and get rid of the whole bill of rights? I think the people at [wikipedia] would be more attuned to your baseless ramblings... --[[User:mittromney|mittromney]] 4:57, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
1) hunger 2) preventable disease 3) unsolved diseases like AIDS 4) natural resources 5) preventing war 6) poverty ..... 19) global warming 20) asteroid striking Earth.
1) overpopulation 2) preventing war 3) preventable disease 4) natural resource protection .... 19) maintaining American sovereignty over the world 20) asteroid striking Earth. My quick 0.02, arbitraged through the Euro. [[User:Human|Human]] 00:19, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
1) totalitarianism/world government 2) global warming 3) pandemic risk 4) US national debt 5) genocide [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:22, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
1) terrorism 2) Communism 3) genocide 4) Hunger/Poverty (not the government's job however)... 19) US national debt ..... 267) natural resources ..... 1,532) asteroid striking earth ..... 7,854,238) alien invasion 7,854,239) global warming. --[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 00:31, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
1) preventing gay marriage 2) preventing abortion 3) putting the 10 commandments in schools 4) convincing the global scientific community that evolution is false 5) defeating terrorism indefinitely and continuously 6) stopping liberals 7) keeping guns 8) stopping socialised health care 9) preventing environmentalist lies from damaging America's economy 10) making the speed of light more scriptural 11) abolishing public education 12) promoting conservative facts
1) Rejection of God. Solve that one and the rest would fall into place. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:17, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
1)Prevent global warming, by finding alternative (read:wind, solar, hydrogen, and, if it ever appears, fusion) sources of energy.
2) Stop, and reverse, the deleterious effect that free trade and international repression has had on developing African and Asia countries.
3) Enshrine the [[UDHR]], the effective culmination of 12,000 years of thought from various religions and philosophies, into national law throughout the world. Give the UN a credible way of enforcing this which is independent of [[Russia|various]] [[USA|national]] [[China|interests]]. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]</sup>
::: Yikes, add mind control--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 18:03, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
1) Poverty (people with money tend not to go hungry). 2) Wider, deeper democracy in all countries. 3) Preventable disease. 4) Alternative energy sources. 5) Be generally nicer to each other. --[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 10:52, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
(1) Homosexuality; (2) Lack of acceptance of Jesus Christ as the one Lord, our God and Saviour; (3) Buttsex; (4) Hippies; (5) People who don't like chocolate sprinkles (I had a hard time ordering 4 and 5); (6) Brown people.--[[User:mittromney|mittromney]] 4:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
1) Wealth Distribution 2) Global Warming 3) UN given greater powers 4) Save as many species as possible 5) Gun control [[User:50something|50something]]
::: What's wrong with wealth distribution? Don't you want people to have incentives to work hard? Global warming is a phantom. Do I even have to go into the total and complete worthlessness of the UN? Why would you want an organization that promotes fascism and homosexuality to be more powerful? I may most strongly disagree with you on (4). Who are you to think that some species deserve to live even though God obviously put them in a place where they are destined to die out? Isn't that hubris of the worst kind? "I think God did a bad job with this species and it's up to me to come in and make sure what should happen to it, should God's plan be brought to fruition, in fact does not?" And then gun control: Let me guess, once we repeal the second amendment, we should just go ahead and get rid of the whole bill of rights? I think the people at [wikipedia] would be more attuned to your baseless ramblings... --[[User:mittromney|mittromney]] 4:57, 8 May 2007 (EDT)