Changes

247 bytes added ,  21:58, May 8, 2007
no edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:     
But it can't be called a "Law" of motion unless it fits the observed facts (see [[astronomy]]). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:53, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
But it can't be called a "Law" of motion unless it fits the observed facts (see [[astronomy]]). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:53, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
It is in general chemistry textbooks from which I teach that light breaks the C-Cl bond, and that the Cl* can then abstract an oxygen atom from a ozone molecule.  That can be determined by simple bond energies.  This is not a liberal conspiracy.
408

edits