1,066
edits
Changes
Talk:Fourteenth Amendment (view source)
Revision as of 05:03, February 22, 2007
, 05:03, February 22, 2007reply
:::: No, that doesn't follow. This project is in its infancy and of course not everything is sourced yet. But that does not authorize a visitor to delete material that is obviously true, albeit unsourced, in order to advance a biased agenda.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:58, 21 February 2007 (EST)
:::: No, that doesn't follow. This project is in its infancy and of course not everything is sourced yet. But that does not authorize a visitor to delete material that is obviously true, albeit unsourced, in order to advance a biased agenda.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:58, 21 February 2007 (EST)
::::: Um, the statement as phrased isn't obvious to me nor apparently to this editor. I would presume a large amount of the matter would hinge on how you define terms. Furthermore, it isn't clear to me how any other "unsourced" claim you've complained about has been any less "obvious" nor for that matter where the Conservapedia Commandments make a distinction between "obvious" and "unobvious" unsourced claims. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 00:03, 22 February 2007 (EST)