Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,376
edits
Changes
HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.redstate.com → https://www.redstate.com (2), http://www.telegraph.co.uk → https://www.telegraph.co.uk, http://www.theblaze.com → https://www.theblaze.com, http://www.dailymail.co.uk → https://www.dailymail.c...
== We've gotta get this picture ==
== We've gotta get this picture ==
Shirtless, horseriding Putin vs bicycle ridding Obama: [http://www.redstate.com/uploads/2015/09/01-007d-620x506.jpg]
Shirtless, horseriding Putin vs bicycle ridding Obama: [https://www.redstate.com/uploads/2015/09/01-007d-620x506.jpg]
:Putin agrees with Western conservatives are some issues (homosexuality, etc.), but he is an autocrat (a popular one in Russia) who disagrees with much of the freedoms in the Bill of Rights and political freedom principles in other Western democracies. He also lies and he previously worked for the KGB.
:Putin agrees with Western conservatives are some issues (homosexuality, etc.), but he is an autocrat (a popular one in Russia) who disagrees with much of the freedoms in the Bill of Rights and political freedom principles in other Western democracies. He also lies and he previously worked for the KGB.
Who came up with the "spontaneous reaction to a video" story? ''Was it the same person or persons who decided to stick to that explanation and have UN ambassador Susan Rice repeat the same lie on national television and six times in the president’s speech at the United Nations–even, most chillingly of all, have Secretary of State Hillary Clinton repeat it to Tyrone Woods’ parents over the coffin of their dead son at Andrews Air Force Base, saying she would “make sure the person who made the film is arrested.”''[http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/13/three-key-questions-on-benghazi-scandal.html] Judging from the "clock boy" story, Obama likes nothing better than a good Islamist hoax. Someone appearently concocted the video story well in advance. Was the administration so attached to this story that they sacrificed an ambassador so they could have the opportunity to use it? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:25, 24 October 2015 (EDT)
Who came up with the "spontaneous reaction to a video" story? ''Was it the same person or persons who decided to stick to that explanation and have UN ambassador Susan Rice repeat the same lie on national television and six times in the president’s speech at the United Nations–even, most chillingly of all, have Secretary of State Hillary Clinton repeat it to Tyrone Woods’ parents over the coffin of their dead son at Andrews Air Force Base, saying she would “make sure the person who made the film is arrested.”''[http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/13/three-key-questions-on-benghazi-scandal.html] Judging from the "clock boy" story, Obama likes nothing better than a good Islamist hoax. Someone appearently concocted the video story well in advance. Was the administration so attached to this story that they sacrificed an ambassador so they could have the opportunity to use it? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:25, 24 October 2015 (EDT)
:It seems that Hillary reversed herself at the recent hearing and testified that she never blamed the attack on the notorious "Innocence of Muslims" video.[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/hillary-clinton/11951682/Hillary-Clintons-big-Benghazi-lie.html] Good grief! How does this woman keep up with her own lies? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:13, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
:It seems that Hillary reversed herself at the recent hearing and testified that she never blamed the attack on the notorious "Innocence of Muslims" video.[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/hillary-clinton/11951682/Hillary-Clintons-big-Benghazi-lie.html] Good grief! How does this woman keep up with her own lies? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:13, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
::Are you sure? Why would she deny blaming the attack on the video when she is recorded doing so at a public event? I read that not only did she blame the video, but that the origin of that story was traced back to Hillary Clinton. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 07:54, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
::Are you sure? Why would she deny blaming the attack on the video when she is recorded doing so at a public event? I read that not only did she blame the video, but that the origin of that story was traced back to Hillary Clinton. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 07:54, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
:::“I said ''some'' have sought to justify the attack because of the video. I used those words deliberately, not to ascribe a motive to every attacker but as a warning to those across the region that there was no justification for further attacks." ([http://featuredyoutube.com/clinton-claims-she-didnt-blame-benghazi-attack-on-a-youtube-video/ video] and [https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/10/hillarys_worst_crime_was_against_the_filmmaker.html write up]) This is such a Clintonian answer, a gem of the genre. Some people said some things, and those things may or may not have been partially true. But as for Hillary, she was just commenting on the remarkable things these other people were saying and doing. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 16:59, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
:::“I said ''some'' have sought to justify the attack because of the video. I used those words deliberately, not to ascribe a motive to every attacker but as a warning to those across the region that there was no justification for further attacks." ([http://featuredyoutube.com/clinton-claims-she-didnt-blame-benghazi-attack-on-a-youtube-video/ video] and [https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/10/hillarys_worst_crime_was_against_the_filmmaker.html write up]) This is such a Clintonian answer, a gem of the genre. Some people said some things, and those things may or may not have been partially true. But as for Hillary, she was just commenting on the remarkable things these other people were saying and doing. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 16:59, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
== Trump and his protesters ==
== Trump and his protesters ==
[http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/01/10/the-silently-protesting-muslim-woman-at-the-trump-rally-wasn-t-alone.html This article] takes a look at a group of professional protesters that go to Trump rallies to try to shut them down. Apparently, Trump said something or other about Muslims that made these people upset. In other words, the protests are an attempt to impose religious censorship. Or at least this article, obviously written by a sympathetic journalist, doesn't argue that they are about anything more noble than that. The protesters have the nerve to compare themselves to Rosa Parks. Uh, excuse me, but wasn't Parks protesting segregation rather than free speech? There are many Muslim countries in the world where criticism of Islam is banned. If your delicate ears cannot withstand such criticism, may I suggest moving to one of them? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 05:06, 11 January 2016 (EST)
[https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/01/10/the-silently-protesting-muslim-woman-at-the-trump-rally-wasn-t-alone.html This article] takes a look at a group of professional protesters that go to Trump rallies to try to shut them down. Apparently, Trump said something or other about Muslims that made these people upset. In other words, the protests are an attempt to impose religious censorship. Or at least this article, obviously written by a sympathetic journalist, doesn't argue that they are about anything more noble than that. The protesters have the nerve to compare themselves to Rosa Parks. Uh, excuse me, but wasn't Parks protesting segregation rather than free speech? There are many Muslim countries in the world where criticism of Islam is banned. If your delicate ears cannot withstand such criticism, may I suggest moving to one of them? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 05:06, 11 January 2016 (EST)
*I see that the protester scum are being hailed by John Kasich[https://www.newsmax.com/Politics/kasich-trump-muslim-protester/2016/01/09/id/708858/] as well by the Huma-affiliated CAIR.[http://bsccomment.com/2016/01/11/cair-urges-trump-to-apologise-to-muslim-protester-ejected.html] Kasich is a literal sellout. He was a conservative governor of Ohio, but then he took the money of Clinton pal Ron Burkle to run as a liberal Republican.[http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-ron-burkle-clintons-20160107-story.html] In other words, he is this year’s Jon Huntsman. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:49, 12 January 2016 (EST)
*I see that the protester scum are being hailed by John Kasich[https://www.newsmax.com/Politics/kasich-trump-muslim-protester/2016/01/09/id/708858/] as well by the Huma-affiliated CAIR.[http://bsccomment.com/2016/01/11/cair-urges-trump-to-apologise-to-muslim-protester-ejected.html] Kasich is a literal sellout. He was a conservative governor of Ohio, but then he took the money of Clinton pal Ron Burkle to run as a liberal Republican.[http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-ron-burkle-clintons-20160107-story.html] In other words, he is this year’s Jon Huntsman. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:49, 12 January 2016 (EST)
== Donald Trump as the next president of the United States ==
== Donald Trump as the next president of the United States ==
I realize that Wall Street and the Democratic Party favor Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders and there is a lot of corruption in the Obama administration, but Hillary may be indicted in about 60 days according to a former federal prosecutor.[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/01/07/former-federal-prosecutor-predicts-hillary-clinton-may-be-indicted-in-next-60-days-heres-why/] If justice proves to be ultimately impartial, then Hillary could be indicted and convicted just like General Petraeus was over his email security breeches.
I realize that Wall Street and the Democratic Party favor Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders and there is a lot of corruption in the Obama administration, but Hillary may be indicted in about 60 days according to a former federal prosecutor.[https://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/01/07/former-federal-prosecutor-predicts-hillary-clinton-may-be-indicted-in-next-60-days-heres-why/] If justice proves to be ultimately impartial, then Hillary could be indicted and convicted just like General Petraeus was over his email security breeches.
It does appear as if the FBI will have a large body of evidence against Hillary in relation to her email scandal and possibly the corruption related to the Clinton Foundation. I don't know if Obama wants to jeopardize how historians view his presidency by letting Hillary off the hook.
It does appear as if the FBI will have a large body of evidence against Hillary in relation to her email scandal and possibly the corruption related to the Clinton Foundation. I don't know if Obama wants to jeopardize how historians view his presidency by letting Hillary off the hook.
== What happens if Hillary is indicted? ==
== What happens if Hillary is indicted? ==
Answer: She can keep running for president. The Dems won't mind a bit! The trail is being blazed by Kathleen Kane, Pennsylvania Democratic and indicted attorney general. In the latest poll, Kane is ahead of her nearest primary challenger 31-18.[http://www.redstate.com/2016/01/27/kathleen-kane-poll-democrats-pennsylvania/] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 21:21, 27 January 2016 (EST)
Answer: She can keep running for president. The Dems won't mind a bit! The trail is being blazed by Kathleen Kane, Pennsylvania Democratic and indicted attorney general. In the latest poll, Kane is ahead of her nearest primary challenger 31-18.[https://www.redstate.com/2016/01/27/kathleen-kane-poll-democrats-pennsylvania/] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 21:21, 27 January 2016 (EST)
:While Obama decides whether or not to indict Hillary, Hillary talks about what a "great" Supreme Court justice he would be.[http://www.inquisitr.com/2743941/obama-supreme-court/] Hey, that doesn't sound corrupt at all, does it? The only previous president appointed to the Supreme Court was Taft in 1921. That was not by Taft's immediate successor but eight years after he left office. Taft had been a solicitor general and an appeals court judge before becoming president. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 15:10, 28 January 2016 (EST)
:While Obama decides whether or not to indict Hillary, Hillary talks about what a "great" Supreme Court justice he would be.[http://www.inquisitr.com/2743941/obama-supreme-court/] Hey, that doesn't sound corrupt at all, does it? The only previous president appointed to the Supreme Court was Taft in 1921. That was not by Taft's immediate successor but eight years after he left office. Taft had been a solicitor general and an appeals court judge before becoming president. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 15:10, 28 January 2016 (EST)
::Here's a great tweet from David Frum: "Sanders closing Iowa argument: “Imagine a better world!” Clinton closing argument: “We’re highly confident no indictments are forthcoming." I take it Obama responded favorably to Hillary's Supreme Court trial balloon. All the leaks are presumably from someone in the FBI who isn't happy with this decision. Wouldn't it be great if a Republican gets sworn in and Hillary has to flee to Russia like Snowden? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 05:16, 31 January 2016 (EST)
::Here's a great tweet from David Frum: "Sanders closing Iowa argument: “Imagine a better world!” Clinton closing argument: “We’re highly confident no indictments are forthcoming." I take it Obama responded favorably to Hillary's Supreme Court trial balloon. All the leaks are presumably from someone in the FBI who isn't happy with this decision. Wouldn't it be great if a Republican gets sworn in and Hillary has to flee to Russia like Snowden? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 05:16, 31 January 2016 (EST)
:AugustO, I know you are from Germany. Conservapedia's "[[Bestiality and Germany]]" article ranks #2 at a popular search engine (which begins with a G) for this particular search term. And the article has nearly 8,000 page views.
:AugustO, I know you are from Germany. Conservapedia's "[[Bestiality and Germany]]" article ranks #2 at a popular search engine (which begins with a G) for this particular search term. And the article has nearly 8,000 page views.
:On July 1, 2013 the ''Daily Mail'' reported that bestiality brothels were spreading quickly through Germany. In addition, there were "even 'erotic zoos' which people can visit to abuse animals ranging from llamas to goats."[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2352779/Bestiality-brothels-spreading-Germany-campaigner-claims-abusers-sex-animals-lifestyle-choice.html]
:On July 1, 2013 the ''Daily Mail'' reported that bestiality brothels were spreading quickly through Germany. In addition, there were "even 'erotic zoos' which people can visit to abuse animals ranging from llamas to goats."[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2352779/Bestiality-brothels-spreading-Germany-campaigner-claims-abusers-sex-animals-lifestyle-choice.html]
:In recent years, several countries with high rates of Darwinism/atheism have experienced problems relating to bestiality (see: [[Bestiality and various geographic areas|Geographic areas where bestiality is posing a notable problem]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[evolutionary belief and bestiality]]).
:In recent years, several countries with high rates of Darwinism/atheism have experienced problems relating to bestiality (see: [[Bestiality and various geographic areas|Geographic areas where bestiality is posing a notable problem]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[evolutionary belief and bestiality]]).