Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,161
edits
Changes
→top: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://creation.com → https://creation.com
[[Creation scientist]]s disagree with this dating,<ref>Riddle, Mike. “Does Radiometric Dating Prove the Earth Is Old?” ''Answers in Genesis'', 4 Oct. 2007, https://answersingenesis.org/geology/radiometric-dating/does-radiometric-dating-prove-the-earth-is-old/
[[Creation scientist]]s disagree with this dating,<ref>Riddle, Mike. “Does Radiometric Dating Prove the Earth Is Old?” ''Answers in Genesis'', 4 Oct. 2007, https://answersingenesis.org/geology/radiometric-dating/does-radiometric-dating-prove-the-earth-is-old/
</ref> citing the [[Radiometric dating#Acceptance and reliability|unreliability]] of the methods used to arrive at such a figure.<ref>Snelling, Andrew. “Radioactive ‘Dating’ Failure.” ''Creation.com | Creation Ministries International'', http://creation.com/radioactive-dating-failure.
</ref> citing the [[Radiometric dating#Acceptance and reliability|unreliability]] of the methods used to arrive at such a figure.<ref>Snelling, Andrew. “Radioactive ‘Dating’ Failure.” ''Creation.com | Creation Ministries International'', https://creation.com/radioactive-dating-failure.
e</ref>
e</ref>