| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | In the 1870s one by one, white congressional abolitionists abandoned the cause, typified by [[Charles Sumner]] who switched to the Liberal Republicans in 1872. In the mid-1870s the [[Redeemers]] (the Southern wing of the [[Bourbon Democrats]] in the [[Democratic Party]]) overthrew the Republican coalition that had controlled the southern states during "Black Reconstruction" after 1867. The Redeemers replaced the [[civil rights]] reforms of [[Reconstruction]] with Jim Crow laws that legalized racial segregation in public places. The Redeemers eliminated or curtailed African-American voting rights. In effect they replaced the short period after slavery when African Americans enjoyed some legal rights with segregation laws that impacted African-Americans socially, politically, and economically for the next 80 years. | | In the 1870s one by one, white congressional abolitionists abandoned the cause, typified by [[Charles Sumner]] who switched to the Liberal Republicans in 1872. In the mid-1870s the [[Redeemers]] (the Southern wing of the [[Bourbon Democrats]] in the [[Democratic Party]]) overthrew the Republican coalition that had controlled the southern states during "Black Reconstruction" after 1867. The Redeemers replaced the [[civil rights]] reforms of [[Reconstruction]] with Jim Crow laws that legalized racial segregation in public places. The Redeemers eliminated or curtailed African-American voting rights. In effect they replaced the short period after slavery when African Americans enjoyed some legal rights with segregation laws that impacted African-Americans socially, politically, and economically for the next 80 years. |
| | | | |
| − | Public opinion, among northern whites, and most opinion by white scholars, accepted or applauded the Redeemers, but some clung to the abolitionist viewpoint. McPherson <ref>McPherson, ''Abolitionist Legacy'' page 5, 114, 317–385, 390</ref> reports that 15 of 24 ex-abolitionists who wrote about Reconstruction called it a "qualified success." However others, including [[Frederick Douglass]], said Reconstruction had, "carried the colored voter to an altitude unsuited to his attainments."<ref>McPherson 1975</ref> | + | Public opinion, among northern whites, and most opinion by white scholars, accepted or applauded the Redeemers, but some clung to the abolitionist viewpoint. McPherson<ref>McPherson, ''Abolitionist Legacy'' page 5, 114, 317–385, 390</ref> reports that 15 of 24 ex-abolitionists who wrote about Reconstruction called it a "qualified success." However others, including [[Frederick Douglass]], said Reconstruction had, "carried the colored voter to an altitude unsuited to his attainments."<ref>McPherson 1975</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | In the 1880s nationalist historians like [[James Ford Rhodes]] held that secession over the issue of slavery was a primary cause of the Civil War. Neoabolitionists in the 1960s added that nation had a moral debt to abolish the abomination that was slavery, and to guarantee equal rights for Blacks, especially to guarantee voting rights. | + | In the 1880s nationalist historians like [[James Ford Rhodes]] held that secession over the issue of slavery was a primary cause of the Civil War. Neoabolitionists in the 1960s added that nation had a moral debt to abolish the abomination that was slavery, and to guarantee equal rights for Blacks, especially to guarantee voting rights. |
| | | | |
| | ==Early 20th century== | | ==Early 20th century== |
| Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| | In the 1930s a minority view by [[W.E.B. Du Bois]] presented positive views of the achievements of Reconstruction for its advocacy of civil rights for African Americans, including ensuring, for a brief period, the right to vote. | | In the 1930s a minority view by [[W.E.B. Du Bois]] presented positive views of the achievements of Reconstruction for its advocacy of civil rights for African Americans, including ensuring, for a brief period, the right to vote. |
| | | | |
| − | | + | Du Bois, a founder of the [[NAACP]], argued from a Marxist perspective that economic equality among black and white people would lead to equality for all. |
| − | Du Bois, a founder of the [[NAACP]], argued from a Marxist perspective that economic equality among black and white people would lead to equality for all. | |
| | | | |
| | ==Civil Rights Movement as "new abolitionists"== | | ==Civil Rights Movement as "new abolitionists"== |
| Line 61: |
Line 60: |
| | <references/> | | <references/> |
| | | | |
| − | [[Category:History]] | + | [[Category:United States History]] |
| | [[Category:Historians]] | | [[Category:Historians]] |
| | [[Category:Civil Rights]] | | [[Category:Civil Rights]] |