Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,716
edits
Changes
→Conservapedia triumphs over atheist/agnostic wiki: reply
:::If you asked 99.99999999999999999999 (etc. etc. to nearly infinity) of the American population who Ace McWicked is, they would have a blank face. The truth is that other than Edmund Hillary most Americans have never heard of any people from NZ who ever have lived. Ace McWicked has zero influence on editors of Conservapedia. On the other hand, there are gentlemen at a certain wiki who remain obsessed with Conservapedia (see: [[Essay: Conservapedia obsessive compulsive disorder]]). And a quick examination of Ace McWicked's posts indicate that Conservapedia's various articles on the [[Atheism and morality|immoral acts of atheists]] are a bee in his bonnet. I have enjoyed poking fun at the various follies of Ace McWicked though. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:15, 17 April 2019 (EDT)
:::If you asked 99.99999999999999999999 (etc. etc. to nearly infinity) of the American population who Ace McWicked is, they would have a blank face. The truth is that other than Edmund Hillary most Americans have never heard of any people from NZ who ever have lived. Ace McWicked has zero influence on editors of Conservapedia. On the other hand, there are gentlemen at a certain wiki who remain obsessed with Conservapedia (see: [[Essay: Conservapedia obsessive compulsive disorder]]). And a quick examination of Ace McWicked's posts indicate that Conservapedia's various articles on the [[Atheism and morality|immoral acts of atheists]] are a bee in his bonnet. I have enjoyed poking fun at the various follies of Ace McWicked though. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:15, 17 April 2019 (EDT)
::::I remember in one of your articles you said some militant atheists had a following on Reddit until a "Faces of Atheism" feature appeared, and they failed the internet nerd test in front of their readers which led to a decline of influence on Reddit. And in another the Alexa rankings you had which backed up your reports of Dawkins' New Atheist website decline after Elevatorgate.
::::I'm not interested in your voluminous atheism articles all alike—based on the titles—though I've read a great many, and some I go to, when you link to them, in a spirit of "eating my vegetables", because I think I ought to know about the dangerous tendrils that extend from that movement. But even with those, I'll be reading, and you'll suddenly drop a jaw-dropping fact about these groups. For example in your [[Atheism vs. Islam]] article you talk about the leader of one of these (declining) movements who ''refuses to discuss'' atheism.
::::So much for "free-thinkers", huh? Not so free after all. I mean believers in God restrain themselves from speaking casually of what is holy, but these atheists boast that their logic is unswayed by all that, and have the power to employ it in bold usages as "shock troops", then are "shocked" to find estimations of themselves diminished by insights they were once able to deflect outright! That's progress in my book, and that happens to be what I think about the most when you mark their decline. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Wednesday, 13:40, 17 April 2019 (EDT)
== Conservapedia's influence on the atheist population ==
== Conservapedia's influence on the atheist population ==
Please read this article: [[Essay: Conservapedia's effect on the atheist population]].[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:15, 17 April 2019 (EDT)
Please read this article: [[Essay: Conservapedia's effect on the atheist population]].[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:15, 17 April 2019 (EDT)