Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,382
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Conservative point of view (CPOV) (view source)
Revision as of 20:26, April 20, 2019
, 20:26, April 20, 2019→"All articles must follow it"
I obviously agree that all articles touching political principals and concepts should, but there are some articles which have no liberal/conservative controversy. For example, [[Cookie]] does not really need to speak from any political POV. To say that cookies are evil and should be banned because they make people fat would be liberal, but how do you write this in a conservative point of view? Just say "Everything in moderation"? What about [[Computer]]? It could be skewed to say that they can be used for liberal and evil purposes, and therefore are bad, but the same could be said about a screwdriver (it can tighten/loosen screws, or stab people). I guess the point I'm trying to make is that we shouldn't make such a sweeping declaration that it sounds like everything must be deliberately slanted to a CPOV, but a
I obviously agree that all articles touching political principals and concepts should, but there are some articles which have no liberal/conservative controversy. For example, [[Cookie]] does not really need to speak from any political POV. To say that cookies are evil and should be banned because they make people fat would be liberal, but how do you write this in a conservative point of view? Just say "Everything in moderation"? What about [[Computer]]? It could be skewed to say that they can be used for liberal and evil purposes, and therefore are bad, but the same could be said about a screwdriver (it can tighten/loosen screws, or stab people). I guess the point I'm trying to make is that we shouldn't make such a sweeping declaration that it sounds like everything must be deliberately slanted to a CPOV, but a
CPOV should be used for anywhere it is relevant. I'm not sure how best to word this. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 16:21, 20 April 2019 (EDT)
CPOV should be used for anywhere it is relevant. I'm not sure how best to word this. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 16:21, 20 April 2019 (EDT)
:Easy. You just modify the mainspace to say "All controversial articles must follow it," or ""All articles dealing with a social, political, religious, economic or ideological topic must follow it," or somesuch. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 16:26, 20 April 2019 (EDT)