Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,462
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Conservative point of view (CPOV) (view source)
Revision as of 20:38, April 20, 2019
, 20:38, April 20, 2019→"All articles must follow it": fixing indent (conflict)
::How about "''All articles dealing with a social, political, religious, economic or ideological topic must follow it''" -- no need for "controversial", and better to say "must" than "encouraged." --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:35, 20 April 2019 (EDT)
::How about "''All articles dealing with a social, political, religious, economic or ideological topic must follow it''" -- no need for "controversial", and better to say "must" than "encouraged." --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:35, 20 April 2019 (EDT)
::"controversial" works for me, though if you want to over-think it, liberals like to pretend that their new, alternative way of looking at something is the only reasonable, unchallenged and non-controversial way of looking at it. Naming categories specifically is more absolute and non-negotiable, which seems like a good thing for a policy. However, there may still be edge cases which don't specifically fall into those categories. Still, that's much better than it is now, and probably good enough. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 16:38, 20 April 2019 (EDT)
:::"controversial" works for me, though if you want to over-think it, liberals like to pretend that their new, alternative way of looking at something is the only reasonable, unchallenged and non-controversial way of looking at it. Naming categories specifically is more absolute and non-negotiable, which seems like a good thing for a policy. However, there may still be edge cases which don't specifically fall into those categories. Still, that's much better than it is now, and probably good enough. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 16:38, 20 April 2019 (EDT)