Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,462
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Conservative point of view (CPOV) (view source)
Revision as of 20:53, April 20, 2019
, 20:53, April 20, 2019→"All articles must follow it": re
::::I'd recommend using this as a Guideline and not a Policy, as yet, until it's tested out and tweaked. Whatsmore, for this guideline to work Admins have to pay closer attention to the Categorization process. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 16:45, 20 April 2019 (EDT)
::::I'd recommend using this as a Guideline and not a Policy, as yet, until it's tested out and tweaked. Whatsmore, for this guideline to work Admins have to pay closer attention to the Categorization process. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 16:45, 20 April 2019 (EDT)
:::::Either is fine with me, since this is really just expounding on the already existing policy. In any case, I wholeheartedly agree about categories. They are improving, but still badly broken in certain ways. If I run a recursive category tree page listing, I can really see some problems. For example, if I check Category:Christianity I get everything from foods to weapons. While both are mentioned in the Bible, which may be where these are coming from in the tree, Christianity is not a subset of foods or weapons, nor is it the other way around. We really need to pay more attention to that. By adding a page to a category, you are saying that this specific page is a smaller part of this category, and it entirely fits inside of this category with almost no overlap. This is not what many of our pages are currently doing. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 16:53, 20 April 2019 (EDT)