Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
improved
Line 1: Line 1:  
[[Image:Anselm.jpg|thumbnail|right|175px|[[Anselm of Canterbury]] was the originator of the ontological argument]]
 
[[Image:Anselm.jpg|thumbnail|right|175px|[[Anselm of Canterbury]] was the originator of the ontological argument]]
−
According to the [[Stanford University|Stanford]] Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Ontological arguments are arguments, for the conclusion that God exists, from premises which are supposed to derive from some source other than observation of the world — e.g., from reason alone."<ref>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ontological-arguments/</ref> [[Anselm of Canterbury]]'s '''ontological argument''' uses the definition of [[God]] to prove His existence.  Anselm's ontological argument remained influential for centuries, and was later used by [[Descartes]]. Anselm's proof is as follows:
+
According to the [[Stanford University|Stanford]] Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Ontological arguments are arguments, for the conclusion that God exists, from premises which are supposed to derive from some source other than observation of the world — e.g., from reason alone."<ref>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ontological-arguments/</ref> [[Anselm of Canterbury]]'s '''ontological argument''' uses the definition of [[God]] to prove His existence.  Anselm's ontological argument remained influential for centuries, and was later used by [[Descartes]]. Mathematician [[Kurt Gödel]] proposed a variation of it based on modern logic.
 +
 
 +
Anselm's proof is as follows:
    
:God is that for which no greater being is conceivable.
 
:God is that for which no greater being is conceivable.
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,797

edits

Navigation menu