Changes

244 bytes added ,  03:37, June 26, 2019
→‎Proposal:Reputable sources: The other sources appear solid, except I'm not sure about the Daily Caller, which may be unable to criticize the Fox News Channel as appropriate.
Line 92: Line 92:     
:This sounds good to me, though I would recommend adding a short explanation on the criteria used for such a list. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:22, 25 June 2019 (EDT)
 
:This sounds good to me, though I would recommend adding a short explanation on the criteria used for such a list. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:22, 25 June 2019 (EDT)
 +
 +
::The other sources appear solid, except I'm not sure about the Daily Caller, which may be unable to criticize the [[Fox News Channel]] as appropriate.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:37, 25 June 2019 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,281

edits