Changes

The arguments against Naturalism are, to a large extent, arguments for a God, or for some kind of intelligent design (see [[Christian apologetics]]):

The arguments against Naturalism are, to a large extent, arguments for a God, or for some kind of intelligent design (see [[Christian apologetics]]):

Argument from Despair: Naturalism leads to human despair because it allows for no cosmic meaning of life and the elimination of free will (and therefore of hope and moral responsibility and the expectation of good).

Argument from Despair: Naturalism leads to human despair because it allows for no cosmic meaning of life and the elimination of free will (and therefore of hope and moral responsibility and the expectation of good); it violates the innate human intuitive perception that life and existence has an ordered purpose for being.

[[Argument from religious experience|Argument from Religious Experience]]: Many people claim to have seen, felt or talked to God or any number of other spirits, including highly intelligent persons who once denied the existence of the supernatural, and claim that these religious experiences refute naturalism.

[[Argument from religious experience|Argument from Religious Experience]]: Many people claim to have seen, felt or talked to God or any number of other spirits, including highly intelligent persons who once denied the existence of the supernatural, and claim that these religious experiences refute naturalism.