Changes

570 bytes added ,  00:48, July 10, 2019
Line 118: Line 118:     
A likely reason why liberals and globalists have adopted a new definition of "sovereignty" is because of the growth of nationalism and anti-internationalism in the world among the public.<ref name="Jasper2004"/> Needing to satisfy those who wish to preserve the [[self-governance]] and independence of the founding fathers, and having contempt for such people, globalists claim they support sovereignty – something which will help assure their maintaining of power so they can continue to undermine national sovereignty.<ref name="Jasper2004"/>
 
A likely reason why liberals and globalists have adopted a new definition of "sovereignty" is because of the growth of nationalism and anti-internationalism in the world among the public.<ref name="Jasper2004"/> Needing to satisfy those who wish to preserve the [[self-governance]] and independence of the founding fathers, and having contempt for such people, globalists claim they support sovereignty – something which will help assure their maintaining of power so they can continue to undermine national sovereignty.<ref name="Jasper2004"/>
 +
 +
This distortion of the meaning of sovereignty can also occur when politicians give the impression that they are nationalist by holding one or two policy positions that appeal to supporters of national sovereignty when those politicians actually take strongly globalist positions overall.<ref>Miguel, Luis (July 8, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/32794-don-t-be-fooled-tulsi-gabbard-is-a-globalist-in-sheep-s-clothing Don’t Be Fooled: Tulsi Gabbard Is a Globalist in Sheep’s Clothing.] ''The New American''. Retrieved July 8, 2019.</ref>
    
==Examples of the War on Sovereignty==
 
==Examples of the War on Sovereignty==
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits