Changes

812 bytes added ,  19:18, May 10, 2007
Line 465: Line 465:     
*And your post shows why.  You are invited, as per above, to place your suggestions here.  :-)  I don't see any improvement template attached here.  --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 22:23, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
*And your post shows why.  You are invited, as per above, to place your suggestions here.  :-)  I don't see any improvement template attached here.  --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 22:23, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Currently an improvement template seems like too much effort.  Sometimes one needs to make a quick edit and just be done with it.  I get this at work, you have to spend several days preparing a Powerpoint presentation to get something done for it to be reviewed by management who then refer it back to the accounts dept, the total cost being greater than the original expenditure request.  It goes against common sense.  Anyway I think your quote looks better but it is still to long for the intro. I know that you think it's important but that doesn't mean that it has to go at the top.  I agree with DanH's comment below.  Maybe you are being a bit too protective of this article. I plan to make some suggestions to AS regarding lcoking and blocking. [[User:Ian St John|Ian St John]] 15:18, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
    
That being said, I wouldn't object to moving the quote down a little further. I think that we should have the article's table of contents visible from the top of the page. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:25, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
That being said, I wouldn't object to moving the quote down a little further. I think that we should have the article's table of contents visible from the top of the page. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:25, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
157

edits