| Line 635: |
Line 635: |
| | *Cadman, Dan (September 12, 2019). [https://cis.org/Cadman/Quick-Reflection-Dissenter-Supreme-Courts-Asylum-Ruling A Quick Reflection on a Dissenter in the Supreme Court's Asylum Ruling]. ''Center for Immigration Studies''. Retrieved September 12, 2019. | | *Cadman, Dan (September 12, 2019). [https://cis.org/Cadman/Quick-Reflection-Dissenter-Supreme-Courts-Asylum-Ruling A Quick Reflection on a Dissenter in the Supreme Court's Asylum Ruling]. ''Center for Immigration Studies''. Retrieved September 12, 2019. |
| | *Horowitz, Daniel (September 12, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/trump-can-take-supreme-court-border-victory-next-level/ How Trump can take the Supreme Court border victory to the next level]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved September 12, 2019. | | *Horowitz, Daniel (September 12, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/trump-can-take-supreme-court-border-victory-next-level/ How Trump can take the Supreme Court border victory to the next level]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved September 12, 2019. |
| − | *Hackman, Michelle; Caldwell, Alicia A. (September 12, 2019). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-asylum-ruling-changes-little-at-border-for-now-11568343997 Supreme Court Asylum Ruling Changes Little at Border for Now]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved September 13, 2019.</ref> | + | *Hackman, Michelle; Caldwell, Alicia A. (September 12, 2019). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-asylum-ruling-changes-little-at-border-for-now-11568343997 Supreme Court Asylum Ruling Changes Little at Border for Now]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved September 13, 2019. |
| | + | *Arthur, Andrew R. (September 13, 2019). [https://cis.org/Arthur/One-Downside-SCOTUS-Decision-ThirdCountry-Transit-Bar-Asylum One Downside to SCOTUS Decision on Third-Country Transit Bar to Asylum]. ''Center for Immigration Studies''. Retrieved September 13, 2019.</ref> |
| | | | |
| | While avoiding ruling on various abortion and transgender-related decisions, the Supreme Court upheld an Indiana law mandating the burial or cremation of aborted babies to go into effect.<ref>Multiple references: | | While avoiding ruling on various abortion and transgender-related decisions, the Supreme Court upheld an Indiana law mandating the burial or cremation of aborted babies to go into effect.<ref>Multiple references: |