nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:Articles for deletion (view source)
Revision as of 04:11, May 13, 2007
, 04:11, May 13, 2007→Comments
Brian and Philip....did you not see the other article on Homosexuality? We are not talking about doing away with anything other than this redundant article, misnamed. Of course anything in the present example, not included there, would be merged. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 20:42, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
Brian and Philip....did you not see the other article on Homosexuality? We are not talking about doing away with anything other than this redundant article, misnamed. Of course anything in the present example, not included there, would be merged. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 20:42, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
:Apart from a reference in the first sentence, what does the [[Homo]] article have to do with homosexuality? Most of [[Homo]] is actually talking about [[homo sapiens]], which is why I'm suggesting merging the relevant parts of this to that. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:11, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
:Apart from a reference in the first sentence, what does the [[Homo]] article have to do with homosexuality? Most of [[Homo]] is actually talking about [[homo sapiens]], which is why I'm suggesting merging the relevant parts of this to that. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:11, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
*Philip, make it so. The point is, it is a stub, and would be better off incorporated into those existing articles. I just assumed, wrongly I guess, that everyone would understand you save the relevant parts, and get rid of the rest. And this isn't even my nomination to delete! Everyone is so picky over things that should be a given. Nothing is ever easy here, is it? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 00:11, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
== [[Kwai nyu rugby]]==
== [[Kwai nyu rugby]]==