Changes

Line 560: Line 560:  
*Gresko, Jessica (June 24, 2019). [https://www.apnews.com/f0767a6ce1aa4dde88fe53b5f1392477 High court strikes down ‘scandalous’ part of trademark law]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
 
*Gresko, Jessica (June 24, 2019). [https://www.apnews.com/f0767a6ce1aa4dde88fe53b5f1392477 High court strikes down ‘scandalous’ part of trademark law]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
 
*Chung, Andrew (June 24, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-profanity/supreme-court-allows-foul-language-trademarks-in-f-word-case-idUSKCN1TP1TQ Supreme Court allows foul language trademarks in F-word case]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
 
*Chung, Andrew (June 24, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-profanity/supreme-court-allows-foul-language-trademarks-in-f-word-case-idUSKCN1TP1TQ Supreme Court allows foul language trademarks in F-word case]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
−
*Haynes, Danielle (June 24, 2019). [https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2019/06/24/Supreme-Court-strikes-down-law-against-scandalous-trademarks/3291561399016/ Supreme Court strikes down law against 'scandalous' trademarks]. ''UPI''. Retrieved June 26, 2019.</ref> Importantly, the Court ruled that the federal courts must stay out of political [[gerrymandering]] disputes.<ref>Multiple references:
+
*Haynes, Danielle (June 24, 2019). [https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2019/06/24/Supreme-Court-strikes-down-law-against-scandalous-trademarks/3291561399016/ Supreme Court strikes down law against 'scandalous' trademarks]. ''UPI''. Retrieved June 26, 2019.</ref> Importantly, the Court ruled that the federal courts must stay out of political [[gerrymandering]] disputes,<ref>Multiple references:
 
*Byas, Steve (June 28, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/32721-supreme-court-gets-it-right-on-redistricting-decision Supreme Court Gets It Right on Redistricting Decision]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 28, 2019.
 
*Byas, Steve (June 28, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/32721-supreme-court-gets-it-right-on-redistricting-decision Supreme Court Gets It Right on Redistricting Decision]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 28, 2019.
 
*Horowitz, Daniel (June 27, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/upshot-todays-scotus-rulings-courts-god-except-one-rare-circumstance/ Upshot of today’s SCOTUS rulings: Courts are God except for one ‘rare circumstance’]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
 
*Horowitz, Daniel (June 27, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/upshot-todays-scotus-rulings-courts-god-except-one-rare-circumstance/ Upshot of today’s SCOTUS rulings: Courts are God except for one ‘rare circumstance’]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
Line 577: Line 577:  
*Klukowski, Ken (June 28, 2019). [https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/06/gerrymandering-symposium-janus-like-judicial-restraint-in-political-gerrymanders-and-the-census/ Gerrymandering symposium: Janus-like judicial restraint in political gerrymanders and the census]. ''SCOTUSblog''. Retrieved July 1, 2019.
 
*Klukowski, Ken (June 28, 2019). [https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/06/gerrymandering-symposium-janus-like-judicial-restraint-in-political-gerrymanders-and-the-census/ Gerrymandering symposium: Janus-like judicial restraint in political gerrymanders and the census]. ''SCOTUSblog''. Retrieved July 1, 2019.
 
*[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/gerrymandering-is-bad-supreme-court-is-right-not-to-fix-it Gerrymandering is bad. Supreme Court is right not to fix it]. ''Washington Examiner''. July 1, 2019. Retrieved July 1, 2019.
 
*[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/gerrymandering-is-bad-supreme-court-is-right-not-to-fix-it Gerrymandering is bad. Supreme Court is right not to fix it]. ''Washington Examiner''. July 1, 2019. Retrieved July 1, 2019.
−
*Barone, Michael (July 2, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/chief-justice-wisely-gets-courts-out-of-redistricting-politics Chief justice wisely gets courts out of redistricting politics]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved July 2, 2019.</ref>
+
*Barone, Michael (July 2, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/chief-justice-wisely-gets-courts-out-of-redistricting-politics Chief justice wisely gets courts out of redistricting politics]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved July 2, 2019.</ref> and later that year, it threw out a lower court ruling against Michigan's gerrymandered districts.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Hughes, Clyde (October 21, 2019). [https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2019/10/21/Supreme-Court-strikes-down-Michigan-gerrymandering-ruling/1331571679685/ Supreme Court strikes down Michigan gerrymandering ruling]. ''UPI''. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
 +
*Quinn, Melissa (October 21, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/supreme-court-throws-out-michigan-partisan-gerrymandering-dispute Supreme Court throws out Michigan partisan gerrymandering dispute in win for state Republicans]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
 +
*Daley, Kevin (October 21, 2019). [https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/21/michigan-gerrymandering-scotus/ Supreme Court Tosses Challenge To Michigan’s Republican-Drawn District Lines]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
 +
*Neidig, Harper (October 21, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/466720-supreme-court-throws-out-challenge-to-michigan-electoral-map Supreme Court throws out challenge to Michigan electoral map]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
 +
*Spangler, Todd (October 21, 2019). [https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2019/10/21/michigan-gerrymandering-us-supreme-court/4051876002/ US Supreme Court overturns ruling in Michigan gerrymandering case: What it means]. ''Detroit Free Press''. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
 +
*Chung, Andrew (October 21, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-gerrymandering/supreme-court-tosses-challenge-to-republican-drawn-michigan-electoral-maps-idUSKBN1X01JU Supreme Court tosses challenge to Republican-drawn Michigan electoral maps]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
 +
*Williams, Pete (October 21, 2019). [https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-wipes-out-michigan-partisan-gerrymander-ruling-n1069476 Supreme Court wipes out ruling on Michigan partisan gerrymander]. ''NBC News''. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
 +
*Ruger, Todd (October 21, 2019). [https://www.rollcall.com/news/congress/supreme-court-erases-michigan-gerrymandering-ruling Supreme Court erases Michigan gerrymandering ruling]. ''Roll Call''. Retrieved October 21, 2019.</ref>
    
On immigration, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of certain conservative Trump Administration policies,<ref>Rodrigo, Chris Mills (September 14, 2019). [https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/461331-supreme-court-comes-to-trumps-aid-on-immigration Supreme Court comes to Trump's aid on immigration]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved September 14, 2019.</ref> including a ruling that the federal government could detain immigrants with criminal records for deportation anytime after their release from prison, rather than just at the very moment of their release.<ref>Multiple references:
 
On immigration, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of certain conservative Trump Administration policies,<ref>Rodrigo, Chris Mills (September 14, 2019). [https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/461331-supreme-court-comes-to-trumps-aid-on-immigration Supreme Court comes to Trump's aid on immigration]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved September 14, 2019.</ref> including a ruling that the federal government could detain immigrants with criminal records for deportation anytime after their release from prison, rather than just at the very moment of their release.<ref>Multiple references:
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits