| Line 68: |
Line 68: |
| | The [[FBI]] took keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange and quickly gathered specific evidence related to Wikileaks and [[Bradley Manning]] for a grand jury by December 2017. Within three months the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018. The EDVA sat on the indictment while the Mueller probe ended. | | The [[FBI]] took keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange and quickly gathered specific evidence related to Wikileaks and [[Bradley Manning]] for a grand jury by December 2017. Within three months the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018. The EDVA sat on the indictment while the Mueller probe ended. |
| | | | |
| − | On April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed. The Mueller report was dependent on [[FAKE NEWS]] ALLEGATIONS OF Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes. | + | On April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed. The Mueller report was dependent on [[fake news]] allegations OF Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes. |
| | | | |
| | The Mueller report claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange on-the-record statements. | | The Mueller report claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange on-the-record statements. |
| Line 78: |
Line 78: |
| | Julian Assange is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack. | | Julian Assange is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack. |
| | | | |
| − | This Russian “hacking” claim is ultimately so important to the [[CIA]], FBI, [[DOJ]], [[ODNI]] and U.K intelligence apparatus. | + | This Russian “hacking” claim is ultimately so important to the [[CIA]], FBI, [[DOJ]], O[[DNI]] and U.K intelligence apparatus.<ref>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/03/why-john-brennan-peter-strzok-and-doj-needed-julian-assange-arrested-and-why-uk-officials-obliged/#more-175242</ref> |
| | | | |
| | == Reactions== | | == Reactions== |