| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | '''Cato's Letters''' (1720–23) were English political essays that shaped [[Republicanism]], demanding civic virtue and denouncing [[corruption]]. It had an enormous influence on the American [[Founding Fathers]] | | '''Cato's Letters''' (1720–23) were English political essays that shaped [[Republicanism]], demanding civic virtue and denouncing [[corruption]]. It had an enormous influence on the American [[Founding Fathers]] |
| | | | |
| − | The example of Roman hero [[Cato the Younger]] inspired English political journalists [[John Trenchard]] and [[Thomas Gordon]] to publish anonymously a series of letters in the ''London Journal'' under the title "Cato's Letters". These 138 short essays appeared in 1720-23; with six new ones they appeared in book form in 1723.
| + | To conceal their identities, the authors used the [[Roman]] statesman, [[Cato the Younger]], as an alias.<ref>http://www.libertyfund.org/details.asp?displayID=1595</ref> These letters were actually written by political journalists John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon and published anonymously in a series of letters in the ''London Journal'' under the title "Cato's Letters". These 138 short essays appeared in 1720-23; with six new ones they appeared in book form in 1723.<br /> |
| | + | All 144 essays were published between 1720-1723; and in 1775, a two-volume modernized sixth edition of the ''Cato's Letters'' was printed in [[London]]. |
| | + | |
| | ==Republicanism== | | ==Republicanism== |
| | They expounded on republicanism. The Roman Republic was the ideal against which they judged all governance. The authors' knowledge of Roman history and literature is staggering; the text is liberally sprinkled with Latin quotations. (The Latin was translated in Hamowy's 1995 edition.) | | They expounded on republicanism. The Roman Republic was the ideal against which they judged all governance. The authors' knowledge of Roman history and literature is staggering; the text is liberally sprinkled with Latin quotations. (The Latin was translated in Hamowy's 1995 edition.) |
| Line 11: |
Line 13: |
| | | | |
| | ===On tyranny=== | | ===On tyranny=== |
| | + | The essays condemned government tyranny and called for the advancement of [[civil liberty|civil liberties]] and [[unalienable rights]] with [[limited government|lower government intervention]]. Here are a few such quotes: |
| | :"The state of tyranny is a state of war." | | :"The state of tyranny is a state of war." |
| | :"Tyranny is not government but a dissolution of it." | | :"Tyranny is not government but a dissolution of it." |
| Line 18: |
Line 21: |
| | | | |
| | ==Imfluence== | | ==Imfluence== |
| − | The ''Letters'' greatly influenced the American Founding Fathers. | + | The ''Letters'' greatly influenced the American Founding Fathers. Trenchard and Gordon's writings presented the core ideas of [[republicanism]] that were adopted by the [[American Patriots|Patriots]] in the [[American Revolution]] and form core [[American values|American political values]]. |
| | | | |
| − | The [[Cato Institute]] is a prominent American libertarian think tank was founded in 1977 in honor of ''Cato's Letters" by Trenchard and Gordon. | + | The [[Cato Institute]] is a prominent American libertarian think tank was founded in 1976<ref>http://www.cato.org/pubs/papers/25th_annual_report.pdf</ref> in honor of ''Cato's Letters" by Trenchard and Gordon. It serves as a public [[libertarian]] policy research organization.<ref>http://www.libertyfund.org/details.asp?displayID=1595</ref> The Cato Institute wrote, |
| | + | {{Cquote|"The [[Cato Institute]] owes its name to Cato’s Letters, a series of essays published in 18th century [[Great Britain]] that presented a vision of a society free from the [[tyranny]] of [[Police state|excessive government power]]. Those same ideals inspired the architects of the American Revolution and continue to inspire the work of the Cato Institute today."<ref>http://www.cato.org/about/reports/annual_report_2005.pdf</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| | Mitchell (2004) argues that ''Cato's Letters'' fall squarely within a liberal republican tradition, embracing [[John Locke]], [[Bernard Mandeville]], and (later) [[David Hume]], and [[Adam Smith]] and suggests that it was in this vein that they were read by the Founding Fathers. | | Mitchell (2004) argues that ''Cato's Letters'' fall squarely within a liberal republican tradition, embracing [[John Locke]], [[Bernard Mandeville]], and (later) [[David Hume]], and [[Adam Smith]] and suggests that it was in this vein that they were read by the Founding Fathers. |