Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,873
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:Articles for deletion (view source)
Revision as of 15:21, May 14, 2007
, 15:21, May 14, 2007→Comments: another perspective
*Philip, make it so. The point is, it is a stub, and would be better off incorporated into those existing articles. I just assumed, wrongly I guess, that everyone would understand you save the relevant parts, and get rid of the rest. And this isn't even my nomination to delete! Everyone is so picky over things that should be a given. Nothing is ever easy here, is it? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 00:11, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
*Philip, make it so. The point is, it is a stub, and would be better off incorporated into those existing articles. I just assumed, wrongly I guess, that everyone would understand you save the relevant parts, and get rid of the rest. And this isn't even my nomination to delete! Everyone is so picky over things that should be a given. Nothing is ever easy here, is it? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 00:11, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
:I would be for a '''merge''', too. However, there is very little to merge because what we see is evolutionists at odds with themselves, or weaseling away from being pinned down on any relevent "facts". The mainspace "homo" should be little more than a wikitionary version of the Greek term, and perhaps something of a disamibiguation page. What is clear, however, is the creation of this page not only was an end run around several other articles, it changes the rules of debate, because it does not hold to same positions articulated elsewhere in the evolutionist viewpoint while at the same time attacking and impugning creationism with alleged "scientific evidence". [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:21, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
== [[Kwai nyu rugby]]==
== [[Kwai nyu rugby]]==