Changes

The radical Cathar texts, in contrast to Manichaeism, teach that there are two principles, each of them a God, at the ontological level. The bad God (''malus deus'') is identified with the creator from the Old Testament <ref>From a later text, written 40 to 30 years later, ''circa'' 1250-1280, ''Liber the Duobis Principiis'', mentioned below.</ref>. Thus ontological dualism appears to be an important point of difference between the ideas of the Manichaeans and of the radical Cathars: the Manichaeans preach one God, while the radical Cathars preach two gods.

The radical Cathar texts, in contrast to Manichaeism, teach that there are two principles, each of them a God, at the ontological level. The bad God (''malus deus'') is identified with the creator from the Old Testament <ref>From a later text, written 40 to 30 years later, ''circa'' 1250-1280, ''Liber the Duobis Principiis'', mentioned below.</ref>. Thus ontological dualism appears to be an important point of difference between the ideas of the Manichaeans and of the radical Cathars: the Manichaeans preach one God, while the radical Cathars preach two gods.

In 1223 the Albigenses are declared to be the local Bougres ("''boogers, buggers''"<ref>[https://www.etymonline.com/word/booger booger (etymonline.com)]</ref>), and in the same period mention is made of the "Pope of the Albigenses who resided within the confines of Bulgaria".  

In 1223 the Albigenses are declared to be the local Bougres ("''boogers, buggers''"<ref>[https://www.etymonline.com/word/booger booger (etymonline.com)]; [https://www.etymonline.com/word/bugger bugger (etymonline.com)]</ref>), and in the same period mention is made of the "Pope of the Albigenses who resided within the confines of Bulgaria".  

A second Hungarian crusade against Bosnia on the pretext of Bogomil heresy was launched in 1225, but failed.

A second Hungarian crusade against Bosnia on the pretext of Bogomil heresy was launched in 1225, but failed.