Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
286 bytes added ,  21:37, May 15, 2007
reworded article
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''Creation science''' is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible—usually with a literal six-day-creation interpretation—and not with the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]].
+
'''Creation science''' is a systematic attempt to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible— usually with a literal six-day-creation interpretation—rather than the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]].
   −
Creation science is not accepted by most scientists, but this is claimed to be due partly to the worldviews of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences. Specifically,
+
Creation science is not accepted by most scientists either in terms of its claims or as a science {{fact}}, but it is claimed by creation scientists that this is due mainly to the worldviews and preconceptions of the scientists, rather than on the basis of scientific evidence{{fact}}.  
a poll among United States scientists showed approximately 55% of scientists believed there is a God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] Also, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html]
+
 
 +
Although a belief in God, does not automatically imply a belief in creationisim, it is interesting to note that a poll among United States scientists showed that approximately 55% of scientists believed there is a God <ref> http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html</ref>, while a similar survey found that 93% of members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God <ref> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Notes and References==
 +
 
 +
<references/>
172

edits

Navigation menu