47
edits
Changes
no edit summary
--[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 17:03, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
--[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 17:03, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
:Right. Good way to wiggle out of an argument. The Bolsheviks just crushed democracy, broke the hereditary lineage of the monarchy by murdering the Royal family, but aren't responsible for what they wrought afterwards. Sounds like Marxist reasoning. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:46, 15 May 2007 (EDT
:Right. Good way to wiggle out of an argument. The Bolsheviks just crushed democracy, broke the hereditary lineage of the monarchy by murdering the Royal family, but aren't responsible for what they wrought afterwards. Sounds like Marxist reasoning. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:46, 15 May 2007 (EDT
Wiggle! You have the audacity to accuse me of wiggling and obfuscating; when I am simply trying to defend Bertrand Russell against the scurrilous accusations made by a contributer to Conservapedia, while you try shift the focus away from this and make it about me, i.e. "sounds like Marxist reasoning." Please address the issue of Bertrand Russell. If you persist in this infantile game, I am going to end this conversation.