Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
426 bytes added ,  15:48, May 16, 2007
Line 73: Line 73:  
:::::Godman, Why do you feel the necessity to engage in name calling?  Isn't using vicious invective hate speech? What about impugning motives without cause?  Doesn't throwing around the term "fascism" recklessly denigrate the meaning and suffering of fascism's real victims?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:16, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::Godman, Why do you feel the necessity to engage in name calling?  Isn't using vicious invective hate speech? What about impugning motives without cause?  Doesn't throwing around the term "fascism" recklessly denigrate the meaning and suffering of fascism's real victims?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:16, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:: I think Coulter's actions speak for themselves. As a practicing Christian and a true conservative I feel some compulsion to point out when radical elements co-opt the label conservative and Christian for their own seemingly cynical ends. That saddens me, as it should any Christian and any patriot, and it weakens the impact of God's message and closes hearts of those whom Coulter attacks. I didn't throw out the label fascism lightly. Coulter's position and belief seem founded on its tenents. By your tacit defense of Coulter, I gather the 'god' you worship delights in hate speech and name calling as does the brand of 'conservatism' you embrace. As it is, conservapedia is an embarassment and an abomionation. The name should be changed to radicalapedia or fascipedia.  [[User:Godman|Godman]] 18:48, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:: I think Coulter's actions speak for themselves. As a practicing Christian and a true conservative I feel some compulsion to point out when radical elements co-opt the label conservative and Christian for their own seemingly cynical ends. That saddens me, as it should any Christian and any patriot, and it weakens the impact of God's message and closes hearts of those whom Coulter attacks. I didn't throw out the label fascism lightly. Coulter's position and belief seem founded on its tenents. By your tacit defense of Coulter, I gather the 'god' you worship delights in hate speech and name calling as does the brand of 'conservatism' you embrace. As it is, conservapedia is an embarassment and an abomionation. The name should be changed to radicalapedia or fascipedia.  [[User:Godman|Godman]] 18:48, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::I really hope you're joking. To suggest that we should disregard MONTHS of precedent on this site and completely warp its original focus to somehow give the impression that one must be a "radical" or "fascist" in order to share their viewpoints is probably one of the most absurd, and, coincidentally, radical and fascistic concepts I have heard in a LONG time. --[[User:Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 11:48, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
    
==Ann's next book==
 
==Ann's next book==

Navigation menu