Changes

:''From my talk page''<br>I have just received the alert to your note and am immediately responding with an ''apologia'' to explain. I sincerely regret that the documented historical fact of gnostic influences in ''some'' (not all) of North American Protestantism as detailed in Philip Lee's book, favorably reviewed, fully verified and competently sourced was perceived as a rant, regretting especially that it is perceived as anti-Protestant. That was not my intention. I have not gone and checked where the material I contributed on the subject researched by Phillip Lee and reviewed and summarized by a respected Protestant pastor, Christian apologist and author was deleted or retained. I am not responsible for the research of others, only for my desire for balanced articles offering a spectrum of views. As long as the summarized material re Philip Lee's book containing historical fact established by his research is retained in some or at least one or two of the most relevant articles, I have no objection. I really do not doubt that you can exercise reasonable judgment as to which articles it is most appropriate. I was only attempting to be as thorough as possible in relating the documentation to as many articles as seemed to me to be relevant, especially those on the recent resurgence of Neo-Gnostic influences, for the sake of informing our readers, who may not read all articles on heresies, Christianity, Protestantism and apostasy, so that at least at those particular relevant articles that they do access they can be more informed. Again, I feel no need to "check" what articles the particular "''Gnostic Protestant''" sections were removed from. I do not believe you attempted any "historical revisionist cover-up" in removing some, or even most of the postings of the material regarding the warning of Gnostic influences in modern liberalist Protestant doctrine in North America. I hope this makes sense. Best regards. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 19:26, 17 February 2020 (EST)

:''From my talk page''<br>I have just received the alert to your note and am immediately responding with an ''apologia'' to explain. I sincerely regret that the documented historical fact of gnostic influences in ''some'' (not all) of North American Protestantism as detailed in Philip Lee's book, favorably reviewed, fully verified and competently sourced was perceived as a rant, regretting especially that it is perceived as anti-Protestant. That was not my intention. I have not gone and checked where the material I contributed on the subject researched by Phillip Lee and reviewed and summarized by a respected Protestant pastor, Christian apologist and author was deleted or retained. I am not responsible for the research of others, only for my desire for balanced articles offering a spectrum of views. As long as the summarized material re Philip Lee's book containing historical fact established by his research is retained in some or at least one or two of the most relevant articles, I have no objection. I really do not doubt that you can exercise reasonable judgment as to which articles it is most appropriate. I was only attempting to be as thorough as possible in relating the documentation to as many articles as seemed to me to be relevant, especially those on the recent resurgence of Neo-Gnostic influences, for the sake of informing our readers, who may not read all articles on heresies, Christianity, Protestantism and apostasy, so that at least at those particular relevant articles that they do access they can be more informed. Again, I feel no need to "check" what articles the particular "''Gnostic Protestant''" sections were removed from. I do not believe you attempted any "historical revisionist cover-up" in removing some, or even most of the postings of the material regarding the warning of Gnostic influences in modern liberalist Protestant doctrine in North America. I hope this makes sense. Best regards. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 19:26, 17 February 2020 (EST)

:::Dataclarifier says, ''I am not responsible for the research of others, only for my desire for balanced articles offering a spectrum of views.''

:::Dataclarifier says, ''I am not responsible for the research of others, only for my desire for balanced articles offering a spectrum of views.''

:::If you post it on CP, you ''are'' responsible for the "research of other; for example, posting excerpts of ''Mein Kampf'' to offer "a spectrum of views" to support of your blatantly anti-scriptural ideology wouldn't be acceptable. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]} 19:07, 4 May 2020 (EDT)

:::If you post it on CP, you ''are'' responsible for the "research of others"; for example, posting excerpts of ''Mein Kampf'' to offer "a spectrum of views" to support of your blatantly anti-scriptural ideology wouldn't be acceptable. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]} 19:07, 4 May 2020 (EDT)