Changes

m
no edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:  
Chief Justice [[John Marshall]] expanded the prohibition against bills of attainder beyond protection of life to protection of property also in ''[[Fletcher v. Peck]]'' (1810).  However, the [[Supreme Court]] has not invalidated any bills of attainder since 1965.  The Court will invalidate such law only if the legislation identifies the affected persons and punishes them without a judicial trial.{{fact}}
 
Chief Justice [[John Marshall]] expanded the prohibition against bills of attainder beyond protection of life to protection of property also in ''[[Fletcher v. Peck]]'' (1810).  However, the [[Supreme Court]] has not invalidated any bills of attainder since 1965.  The Court will invalidate such law only if the legislation identifies the affected persons and punishes them without a judicial trial.{{fact}}
   −
The Supreme Court viewed the bill of attainder as essential to preserve the separation of powers.  The judiciary protects its branch of government by ensuring that only a court can determine the guilt or innocence of an accused.  In ''Cummings v. Missouri'' (1867), the Supreme Court held that the Congress may not "exercise[] the power and office of judge."  In ''United States v. Brown'' (1965), the Court prohibited "legislative punishment, of any form or severity, of specifically designated persons or groups."
+
The Supreme Court viewed the bill of attainder as essential to preserve the separation of powers.  The judiciary protects its branch of government by ensuring that only a court can determine the guilt or innocence of an accused.  In ''[[Cummings v. Missouri]]'' (1867), the Supreme Court held that the Congress may not "exercise the power and office of judge."  In ''[[United States v. Brown]]'' (1965), the Court prohibited "legislative punishment, of any form or severity, of specifically designated persons or groups."
    
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
[[Category:Legal terms]]
 
[[Category:Legal terms]]
1,912

edits