Changes

On March 2, 2017 Farkas, while interviewed on [[MSNBC]]'s ''Morning Joe'', a smoking gun went off: {{Quotebox|“I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill, it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before [[President Obama]] leaves the administration. Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people who left. So, it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, that the Trump folks, '''if they found out how we knew what we knew''' about their -- the staff, the Trump staff's dealing with [[Russia]]ns, that they would try to compromise those sources and methods... So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more."<ref>https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/mike-ciandella/2017/03/30/former-obama-official-stumbles-while-trying-backtrack-after</ref>}}  

On March 2, 2017 Farkas, while interviewed on [[MSNBC]]'s ''Morning Joe'', a smoking gun went off: {{Quotebox|“I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill, it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before [[President Obama]] leaves the administration. Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people who left. So, it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, that the Trump folks, '''if they found out how we knew what we knew''' about their -- the staff, the Trump staff's dealing with [[Russia]]ns, that they would try to compromise those sources and methods... So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more."<ref>https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/mike-ciandella/2017/03/30/former-obama-official-stumbles-while-trying-backtrack-after</ref>}}  

It is shocking that people outside of government readily admit to [[felon]]ious leaking of classified information. In January 2017 the ''[[New York Times]]'' reported, {{Quotebox|"In its final days, the [[Obama administration]] has expanded the power of the [[National Security Agency]] to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections."<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/us/politics/nsa-gets-more-latitude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html ]</ref>}} The expansion of the order made it difficult to narrow in on leaks.<ref>http://circa.com/politics/some-us-intelligence-officials-want-trump-to-rescind-obamas-expansion-of-nsa-data</ref> Farkas' use of the term "people on the hill" refers to people outside the [[Executive Branch]] - Congressional staff which numbers into the tens of thousands. Many staffers have press contacts and are sources of leaks. Once the materials fell into their hands, many partisan staffers then became armchair counter-intelligence sleuths, combing  through the leaked material, feeding their [[mainstream media|mainstream]] sources with their latest pet theories on Donald Trump being in the pay of the [[KGB]], and taking to [[Twitter]] threads with extended narratives full of speculation.

It is shocking that people outside of government readily admit to [[felon]]ious leaking of classified information. In January 2017 the ''[[New York Times]]'' reported, {{Quotebox|"In its final days, the [[Obama administration]] has expanded the power of the [[National Security Agency]] to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections."<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/us/politics/nsa-gets-more-latitude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html ]</ref>}} The expansion of the order made it difficult to narrow in on leaks.<ref>http://circa.com/politics/some-us-intelligence-officials-want-trump-to-rescind-obamas-expansion-of-nsa-data</ref> Farkas' use of the term "people on the Hill" refers to people outside the [[Executive Branch]] - Congressional staff which numbers into the tens of thousands. Many staffers have press contacts and are sources of leaks. Once the materials fell into their hands, many partisan staffers then became armchair counter-intelligence sleuths, combing  through the leaked material, feeding their [[mainstream media|mainstream]] sources with their latest pet theories on Donald Trump being in the pay of the [[KGB]], and taking to [[Twitter]] threads with extended narratives full of speculation.

That Farkas was an active, willing participant in the [[leftist]] [[conspiracy]] to undermine [[democracy]] is undeniable.<ref>https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/2/16/14630856/evelyn-farkas-trump-russia-flynn</ref><ref>One week before the 2016 election, Evelyn Farkas told the Warsaw Security Forum "if Donald Trump were elected I believe he would be [[impeach]]ed pretty quickly or somebody else would have to take over government. And I am not even joking." https://youtu.be/pl_RATH89UM <br/>One month after President Trump's inauguration, Farkas said "last summer I was getting winks and hints from inside that there was something really wrong here." Two weeks later, on March 2, she denied having inside information. https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/08/ex-state-staffer-who-advocated-spying-on-trump-boasted-getting-winks-from-inside-obama-admin/</ref> The only question regarding her complicity is whether she was [[hoax]]ed by Brennan and the ''Steele dossier'', as the [[FISA court]] and millions of Americans were.

That Farkas was an active, willing participant in the [[leftist]] [[conspiracy]] to undermine [[democracy]] is undeniable.<ref>https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/2/16/14630856/evelyn-farkas-trump-russia-flynn</ref><ref>One week before the 2016 election, Evelyn Farkas told the Warsaw Security Forum "if Donald Trump were elected I believe he would be [[impeach]]ed pretty quickly or somebody else would have to take over government. And I am not even joking." https://youtu.be/pl_RATH89UM <br/>One month after President Trump's inauguration, Farkas said "last summer I was getting winks and hints from inside that there was something really wrong here." Two weeks later, on March 2, she denied having inside information. https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/08/ex-state-staffer-who-advocated-spying-on-trump-boasted-getting-winks-from-inside-obama-admin/</ref> The only question regarding her complicity is whether she was [[hoax]]ed by Brennan and the ''Steele dossier'', as the [[FISA court]] and millions of Americans were.