Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,884
edits
Changes
→Matthew 18:15
::Vargas, do you really think that it reflects well to display a harsh, condescending attitude on others who may hold some differing views? I was only suggesting that we could move on from a potentially time-consuming debate that goes nowhere if it could be something more productive. Your type of attitude appears to be what drove Dataclarifier out of CP, and now the latter may not come back ever (maybe due to potential increasing blindness, correct me if I'm wrong). Also, after your half-rant of a response [[User talk:NishantXavier#VargasMilan_responds_to_Liberaltears|here]], it seems that you doubled down by assuming that I "may be angry". Just for the record, I always find humor in your responses, sometimes because you do have a good sense of humor, other times because your attitude demonstrates what could be confirmation bias. So apparently it seems that I can't enter these debates over Bible interpretations without facing your wrath, because valid differing points just cannot be responded to by you in a more constructive, respectable manner. Also, you never responded to the second half mentioned in my post on your talk page [[User_talk:VargasMilan#VargasMilan_proven_right|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]<sup>'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May Dataclarifier be well!]]'''''</sup> 17:58, 12 July 2020 (EDT)
::Vargas, do you really think that it reflects well to display a harsh, condescending attitude on others who may hold some differing views? I was only suggesting that we could move on from a potentially time-consuming debate that goes nowhere if it could be something more productive. Your type of attitude appears to be what drove Dataclarifier out of CP, and now the latter may not come back ever (maybe due to potential increasing blindness, correct me if I'm wrong). Also, after your half-rant of a response [[User talk:NishantXavier#VargasMilan_responds_to_Liberaltears|here]], it seems that you doubled down by assuming that I "may be angry". Just for the record, I always find humor in your responses, sometimes because you do have a good sense of humor, other times because your attitude demonstrates what could be confirmation bias. So apparently it seems that I can't enter these debates over Bible interpretations without facing your wrath, because valid differing points just cannot be responded to by you in a more constructive, respectable manner. Also, you never responded to the second half mentioned in my post on your talk page [[User_talk:VargasMilan#VargasMilan_proven_right|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]<sup>'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May Dataclarifier be well!]]'''''</sup> 17:58, 12 July 2020 (EDT)
:::It's IndependentSkeptic who deserves remonstration. Rather than respond to the point that this subheading was created for, he disrupts the point by posting redundant spam - a blockable offense. It is IndependentSkeptic being incivil. How should people react to such persistent rudeness and incivility? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 18:08, 12 July 2020 (EDT)