Changes

::::lol. If I have one complaint about God and the bible, he doesn't give us much to go on how to deal with a crazy and irrational woman. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]} 03:55, 25 July 2020 (EDT)

::::lol. If I have one complaint about God and the bible, he doesn't give us much to go on how to deal with a crazy and irrational woman. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]} 03:55, 25 July 2020 (EDT)

I'm going to add my own comment. It's pointless to respond to RobSmith's provocative Catholic-baiting and debate statements pregnant with anti-Catholic responses and [[misrepresentation]]s, it only generates more debate, which is what he wants. It's not enough for him to simply respond to controversial topics on the relevant debate page(s), he continues to insist on debate with repetitious content on NishantXavier's talk page (and insults as well), just as I warned he would. He revels in the contention he generates. To restrict him to debate pages only would cramp his style, and leave him unsatisfied and frustrated. That's not what he wants: He's happiest with No holds barred and No rules for debate. <br>@Conservative, even after RobSmith continued to provoke debate on NishantXavier's page you did not move any of RobSmith's debate comments to the relevant Debate pages, though you moved IndependentSkeptic's comment to the Purgatory debate page without including the context of it as being in fact in response to RobSmith's disparaging attack on him ("''you don't know what church is''") and his strawman attack on the doctrine of Purgatory. This suggests to me that you may not be aware of a lack of dispassionate and impartial judgment. With genuine respect. <br> (I did warn IndependentSkeptic to stay off Conservapedia, and he wouldn't listen. I respectfully suggest you permanently block him and me, both of us, Block infinity. I am serious, no joke. Then we can get on with our lives. There is life after Conservapedia.) Thanks. With respect. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 04:31, 25 July 2020 (EDT)

I'm going to add my own comment. It's pointless to respond to RobSmith's provocative Catholic-baiting and debate statements pregnant with anti-Catholic responses and [[misrepresentation]]s, it only generates more debate, which is what he wants. It's not enough for him to simply respond to controversial topics on the relevant debate page(s), he continues to insist on debate with repetitious content on NishantXavier's talk page (and insults as well), just as I warned he would. He revels in the contention he generates. To restrict him to debate pages only would cramp his style, and leave him unsatisfied and frustrated. That's not what he wants: He's happiest with No holds barred and No rules for debate. <br>@Conservative, even after RobSmith continued to provoke debate on NishantXavier's page you did not move any of RobSmith's debate comments to the relevant Debate pages, though you moved IndependentSkeptic's comment to the Purgatory debate page without including the context of it as being in fact in response to RobSmith's disparaging attack on him ("''you don't know what church is''") and his strawman attack on the doctrine of Purgatory. This suggests to me that you may not be aware of a lack of dispassionate and impartial judgment on your part. With genuine respect. <br> (I did warn IndependentSkeptic to stay off Conservapedia, and he wouldn't listen. I respectfully suggest you permanently block him and me, both of us, Block infinity. I am serious, no joke. Then we can get on with our lives. There is life after Conservapedia.) Thanks. With respect. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 04:31, 25 July 2020 (EDT)