Changes

525 bytes added ,  03:37, February 26, 2007
→‎ID and creationism: "divine design", "Logos"
Line 12: Line 12:     
:::Horace, your vision of the article would include a bias, while saying that it is ''unclear'' whether Intelligent Design amounts to a form of Creationism yields no bias.  --[[User:David R|David R]] 22:34, 25 February 2007 (EST)
 
:::Horace, your vision of the article would include a bias, while saying that it is ''unclear'' whether Intelligent Design amounts to a form of Creationism yields no bias.  --[[User:David R|David R]] 22:34, 25 February 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
::: Horace, I'm going to have to disagree here. At least one proponent of ID, Chris Buttars, a state senator of Utah repeatedly called it "Divine Design" and Dembski's Logos comment sounds very close to creationism- the Logos is (to many theologians, and arguably from a straight reading of the text of John) the creative spark. If ID is about the Logos, it is creationism. It seems clear to me that there is sufficient ambiguity that the current version should stand. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 22:37, 25 February 2007 (EST)
1,066

edits