:It should be noted, the defense of Roman Catholic interpretation of Matthew 16:18, ''Thou art Peter...'', using 1 Peter 1:20 ''no scripture is of private interpretation'', is the same author who in the next breath encourages private interpretation: "If a person believes A", or "If a person believes B" to arrive at the same conclusion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 15:14, 3 August 2020 (EDT) | :It should be noted, the defense of Roman Catholic interpretation of Matthew 16:18, ''Thou art Peter...'', using 1 Peter 1:20 ''no scripture is of private interpretation'', is the same author who in the next breath encourages private interpretation: "If a person believes A", or "If a person believes B" to arrive at the same conclusion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 15:14, 3 August 2020 (EDT) |