Changes

Line 164: Line 164:  
:Do whatever you like. We need a good coherent Protagonist position at [[Debate: Is Roman Catholic teaching on the Holy Spirit biblical?]] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 16:21, 30 August 2020 (EDT)
 
:Do whatever you like. We need a good coherent Protagonist position at [[Debate: Is Roman Catholic teaching on the Holy Spirit biblical?]] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 16:21, 30 August 2020 (EDT)
 
::'''Yes''', it '''''is''''' biblical. The Bible citations and quotations in the ''Catechism of the Catholic Church'' prove it! '''CCC 683–747'''. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 16:28, 30 August 2020 (EDT)
 
::'''Yes''', it '''''is''''' biblical. The Bible citations and quotations in the ''Catechism of the Catholic Church'' prove it! '''CCC 683–747'''. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 16:28, 30 August 2020 (EDT)
 +
:::Not it doesn't. You have no clue ''who'' authored that catechism anymore than ''who'' authors Wikipedia. And it was not ''God0breahed'' nor ''holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost''.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup>
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,382

edits