73
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35:
Line 35: + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Locks and Blocks (view source)
Revision as of 11:23, May 19, 2007
, 11:23, May 19, 2007no edit summary
*Bastard is not a curse word, but properly a descriptive noun. FredK, your objection was noted about Ed Poor, and answered. You now have my full attention. Trust me, ask around, you don't want it. Be productive. Contribute. Let your personal vendettas go! --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 00:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
*Bastard is not a curse word, but properly a descriptive noun. FredK, your objection was noted about Ed Poor, and answered. You now have my full attention. Trust me, ask around, you don't want it. Be productive. Contribute. Let your personal vendettas go! --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 00:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
== # Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block only for ideological reasons. ==
Isn't this rather badly phrased?
If conservapedia does not block only for ideological reasons, then presumably it blocks for other ideas in addition to ideological reasons. I'm sure that this is not the intent of the instruction- but it's what it says.--[[User:Bill M|bill m]] 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 07:23, 19 May 2007 (EDT)