Changes

no edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:  
P.S. I suggest reading these two essays: [[Essay: Atheist gentlemen, what we have here is a failure to communicate]] and [[Essay: Will atheism ever disappear?]]. I hope this clarifies things for you.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:55, 17 March 2021 (EDT)
 
P.S. I suggest reading these two essays: [[Essay: Atheist gentlemen, what we have here is a failure to communicate]] and [[Essay: Will atheism ever disappear?]]. I hope this clarifies things for you.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:55, 17 March 2021 (EDT)
 
::::Thou shalt not bear false witness--[[User:Gogo1|Gogo1]] ([[User talk:Gogo1|talk]]) 02:20, 18 March 2021 (EDT)
 
::::Thou shalt not bear false witness--[[User:Gogo1|Gogo1]] ([[User talk:Gogo1|talk]]) 02:20, 18 March 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
== The uncivilized wiki ==
 +
 +
 +
[[File:Gavel.jpg|thumbnail|300px|center|A RationalWiki editor whose username is Christopher wrote at RationalWiki: "Technically...[User: Conservative at Conservapedia].. "shouldn’t have been banned, the vote to ban him was one short of the 2/3 majority that’s needed according to site policy."<ref>[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=prev&oldid=2296799 Revision as of 21:46, 11 March 2021 (view source)
 +
Christopher (talk | contribs)]</ref> 
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
In short, RationalWiki broke its own rules when they permabaned me. According to RationalWiki rules, a permaban requires a 66% majority. RationalWiki permabanned me without such a majority. 
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
Of course, this proves once again that atheism provides no foundation in terms of having a civilized society and that [[Atheist hypocrisy|atheists are often hypocrites]] (see: [[ Atheism and its anti-civilizational effects]] and [[Atheism and culture]] and [[Atheism and human rights]] and [[Atheism and human rights violations]]).
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
And much to the chagrin of RationalWikians who wished to "permaban" me, I can edit RationalWiki whenever I want through creating new accounts.
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
And gentlemen, always remember that in your Chicken Coop kangaroo court, I was not judged by a jury of my peers.
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
One of the administrators of your website who voted in your so-called "trial", namely Oxyaena, admits he is "probably raging too much most of the time to form coherent sentences".
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
On May 24,2020, which is the day he voted on whether a fellow editor (namely me) should be permabanned from the website, the RationalWiki editor who goes by the moniker Amassivegay wrote: "I am never sure I am even coherent most of the time."
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
Gentlemen, you had madmen on the jury! Sad!]]
 +
{{Clear}}
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,753

edits