SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
131
edits
Changes
Talk page reply
==HAHA!==
==HAHA!==
I vaguely remember reading that Brietbart article back in the day. My [[Ukrainian collusion]] article here ranks #1 on Bing, #5 on Google, and #1 on DuckDuckGo. It had some challengers during late 2019 and early 2020, but never fell below #16 (it was #1 at the outset). The page (and some of its subpages) need some editing, but I'm just one guy here trying to chronicle current events. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 17:57, 30 March 2021 (EDT)
I vaguely remember reading that Brietbart article back in the day. My [[Ukrainian collusion]] article here ranks #1 on Bing, #5 on Google, and #1 on DuckDuckGo. It had some challengers during late 2019 and early 2020, but never fell below #16 (it was #1 at the outset). The page (and some of its subpages) need some editing, but I'm just one guy here trying to chronicle current events. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 17:57, 30 March 2021 (EDT)
:{{u|RobSmith}}
:Nice. Yeah, I was the editor that started the whole controversy on Wikipedia. Honestly, the only reason I didn't get banned back in October (and why I am not banned now) is because of my status as "Lead Coordinator of Wikipedia's Current Event WikiProject". Too many people liked the work I did before to start any noticeboards to get me banned. In december 2020 alone I had 4 attempts to get me banned. 3 were dismissed (1 after 45 minutes) and 1 ended in me and the editor who started the ban attempt against me getting warned by an admin. To be fair, I still like editing Wikipedia, but Conservapedia has a high potention to match Wikipedia if a lot of people put the work into it.