Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
5,230
edits
Changes
no edit summary
::::::It was never mentioned that Brad Raffensperger was the source trashing Abrams. Using his name might have even generated some sympathy for Abrams rather than making her look like a paranoid conspiracy kook. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 06:10, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
::::::It was never mentioned that Brad Raffensperger was the source trashing Abrams. Using his name might have even generated some sympathy for Abrams rather than making her look like a paranoid conspiracy kook. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 06:10, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
:::::::And would the fact that Raffensberger was technically on her side be more of a reason to use it as a source since he's literally condemning her? Besides, woke leftists don't even listen to him anyways, even when he's capitulating to their ends. Even though George W. Bush was closer in political outlook to George Lucas regarding globalism, [https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/movies/george-lucas-attacks-us-cultural-imperialism-20060324-gdn8ck.html the latter STILL trashes the former as a provincial boob who doesn't care about the world]. It would be the same deal here. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 06:18, 11 May 2021 (EDT)