Changes

Over 100,000 page edits on Conservapedia provides much data to study and analyze [[liberal]] behavior and trends.  Several important characteristics emerge:

Over 100,000 page edits on Conservapedia provides much data to study and analyze [[liberal]] behavior and trends.  Several important characteristics emerge:

# Liberals, particularly liberal vandals, seem to have a strong desire for attention.  This may motivate many of their statements and arguments.  Lacking motivation based on reason or faith, they seem to enjoy attracting attention for the mere sake of attention itself.  The discussions and debates go nowhere, but their mission is accomplished by having someone pay attention to them.

# Liberals, particularly liberal vandals, seem to have a strong desire for attention.  This may motivate many of their statements and arguments.  Lacking motivation based on reason or faith, they seem to enjoy attracting attention for the mere sake of attention itself.  The discussions and debates go nowhere, but their mission is accomplished by having someone pay attention to them.

# Many liberals think that two wrongs, or a wrong and perceived wrong, make a right.  Specifically, they feel that vandalism can be justified by claiming that someone was wrongly excluded from a private association or private property.  For example, one critic of Conservapedia declared on 5/22/07 that "[t]his site deserves at least 70-80% of the vandalism it receives."  Under the conservative view, nothing justifies vandalism and two wrongs do not make a right.

# Many liberals think that two wrongs, or a wrong and perceived wrong, make a right.  Specifically, they feel that vandalism can be justified by claiming that someone was wrongly excluded from a private association or private property.  For example, one critic of Conservapedia declared on 5/22/07 that "[t]his site deserves at least 70-80% of the vandalism it receives."  Under the conservative view, nothing justifies vandalism and two wrongs do not make a right.