Changes

no edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:     
The source is not the Bible, it is messianic.com\articles\unrighteousacts.htm, from which you copied it almost word from word.  That's why you haven't provided footnotes, references, or links.  Did you, at least, get their permission to use their copyrighted material?
 
The source is not the Bible, it is messianic.com\articles\unrighteousacts.htm, from which you copied it almost word from word.  That's why you haven't provided footnotes, references, or links.  Did you, at least, get their permission to use their copyrighted material?
 +
 +
:Lol - rewording material is not plagiarism, and permission is not needed therefore. Furthermore, a list of facts cannot be considered intellectual copyright. Also, why are footnotes, references or links needed for a list of items that comprise the sole subject matter of the article heading? You seem to be just a little annoyed that I called you out for your rudeness and incivility to another editor. I also note that your contributions consist sonly of liberal carping and complaining on talk pages. Go away and do something productive :) [[User:Fox|Fox]] 18:00, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
6,786

edits